Affiliations 

  • 1 The Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
  • 2 Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
  • 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • 4 Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
  • 5 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • 6 Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • 7 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
  • 8 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the Gothenburg University, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 9 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  • 10 Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
  • 11 Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
  • 12 The Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Electronic address: hong.lee@uq.edu.au
Am J Hum Genet, 2015 Feb 05;96(2):283-94.
PMID: 25640677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.006

Abstract

Genetic risk prediction has several potential applications in medical research and clinical practice and could be used, for example, to stratify a heterogeneous population of patients by their predicted genetic risk. However, for polygenic traits, such as psychiatric disorders, the accuracy of risk prediction is low. Here we use a multivariate linear mixed model and apply multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction for genetic risk prediction. This method exploits correlations between disorders and simultaneously evaluates individual risk for each disorder. We show that the multivariate approach significantly increases the prediction accuracy for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder in the discovery as well as in independent validation datasets. By grouping SNPs based on genome annotation and fitting multiple random effects, we show that the prediction accuracy could be further improved. The gain in prediction accuracy of the multivariate approach is equivalent to an increase in sample size of 34% for schizophrenia, 68% for bipolar disorder, and 76% for major depressive disorders using single trait models. Because our approach can be readily applied to any number of GWAS datasets of correlated traits, it is a flexible and powerful tool to maximize prediction accuracy. With current sample size, risk predictors are not useful in a clinical setting but already are a valuable research tool, for example in experimental designs comparing cases with high and low polygenic risk.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.