Affiliations 

  • 1 Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds 3220, Australia t.jessop@deakin.edu.au
  • 2 Komodo Survival Program, Denpasar 80223, Bali, Indonesia
  • 3 Department of Animal Biology and Genetics, University of Florence, Florence 50125, Italy
  • 4 Komodo National Park, Labuan Bajo 86711, Flores, Indonesia
  • 5 The Environment Institute and School of Earth and Environmental Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
  • 6 Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, New South Wales 2800, Australia
  • 7 School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
Proc Biol Sci, 2018 11 14;285(1891).
PMID: 30429305 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1829

Abstract

Loss of dispersal typifies island biotas, but the selective processes driving this phenomenon remain contentious. This is because selection via, both indirect (e.g. relaxed selection or island syndromes) and direct (e.g. natural selection or spatial sorting) processes may be involved, and no study has yet convincingly distinguished between these alternatives. Here, we combined observational and experimental analyses of an island lizard, the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis, the world's largest lizard), to provide evidence for the actions of multiple processes that could contribute to island dispersal loss. In the Komodo dragon, concordant results from telemetry, simulations, experimental translocations, mark-recapture, and gene flow studies indicated that despite impressive physical and sensory capabilities for long-distance movement, Komodo dragons exhibited near complete dispersal restriction: individuals rarely moved beyond the valleys they were born/captured in. Importantly, lizard site-fidelity was insensitive to common agents of dispersal evolution (i.e. indices of risk for inbreeding, kin and intraspecific competition, and low habitat quality) that consequently reduced survival of resident individuals. We suggest that direct selection restricts movement capacity (e.g. via benefits of spatial philopatry and increased costs of dispersal) alongside use of dispersal-compensating traits (e.g. intraspecific niche partitioning) to constrain dispersal in island species.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.