Affiliations 

  • 1 1School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, Highfield,, Southampton, SO171BJ UK
  • 2 3Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
  • 3 4Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
  • 4 GET.ON Institut für Online Gesundheitstrainings Gmb, Stellv. Geschäftsführung, GET.ON Institut für Online Gesundheitstrainings GmbH, Rothenbaumchaussee 209, 20149 Hamburg, Germany
  • 5 6National University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01 Singapore, Singapore
  • 6 8Centre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
  • 7 9Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Administration Building, Room 24, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada
  • 8 10PPI Representatives, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, Highfield, Southampton, SO171BJ UK
  • 9 11School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Science, Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane, Marston, Oxford, OX3 OFL UK
NPJ Digit Med, 2019;2:85.
PMID: 31508496 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0163-4

Abstract

This paper illustrates a rigorous approach to developing digital interventions using an evidence-, theory- and person-based approach. Intervention planning included a rapid scoping review that identified cancer survivors' needs, including barriers and facilitators to intervention success. Review evidence (N = 49 papers) informed the intervention's Guiding Principles, theory-based behavioural analysis and logic model. The intervention was optimised based on feedback on a prototype intervention through interviews (N = 96) with cancer survivors and focus groups with NHS staff and cancer charity workers (N = 31). Interviews with cancer survivors highlighted barriers to engagement, such as concerns about physical activity worsening fatigue. Focus groups highlighted concerns about support appointment length and how to support distressed participants. Feedback informed intervention modifications, to maximise acceptability, feasibility and likelihood of behaviour change. Our systematic method for understanding user views enabled us to anticipate and address important barriers to engagement. This methodology may be useful to others developing digital interventions.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.