Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Information Technology, Monash University Malaysia, 47500 Selangor, Malaysia. Electronic address: somayeh.ebrah@monash.edu
  • 2 School of Engineering,Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, 47500 Selangor, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • 4 School of Information Technology, Monash University Malaysia, 47500 Selangor, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CSEE), University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park,Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
Artif Intell Med, 2020 06;106:101851.
PMID: 32593389 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101851

Abstract

In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art approaches for knee articular cartilage segmentation from conventional techniques to deep learning (DL) based techniques. Knee articular cartilage segmentation on magnetic resonance (MR) images is of great importance in early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). Besides, segmentation allows estimating the articular cartilage loss rate which is utilised in clinical practice for assessing the disease progression and morphological changes. It has been traditionally applied in quantifying longitudinal knee OA progression pattern to detect and assess the articular cartilage thickness and volume. Topics covered include various image processing algorithms and major features of different segmentation techniques, feature computations and the performance evaluation metrics. This paper is intended to provide researchers with a broad overview of the currently existing methods in the field, as well as to highlight the shortcomings and potential considerations in the application at clinical practice. The survey showed that state-of-the-art techniques based on DL outperform the other segmentation methods. The analysis of the existing methods reveals that integration of DL-based algorithms with other traditional model-based approaches has achieved the best results (mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between 85.8% and 90%).

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.