Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Health Product Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 2 Independent Expert, Welwyn, United Kingdom
  • 3 General Directorate of Medicines Supplies and Drugs (DIGEMID), San Miguel, Peru
  • 4 Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority, Lusaka, Zambia
  • 5 Food and Drug Administration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
  • 6 National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 7 Iran Food and Drug Administration, Tehran, Iran
  • 8 Health Sciences Authority, Singapore
  • 9 Shanghai University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
  • 10 Jordan Food and Drug Administration, Amman, Jordan
  • 11 Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 12 Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong-eup, Republic of Korea
  • 13 Centro para el Control Estatal de Medicamentos, Equipos y Dispositivos Médicos (CECMED), La Habana, Cuba
  • 14 The Indonesian Food and Drug Authority, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 15 Food and Drugs Authority, Accra, Ghana
  • 16 The Federal State Budgetary Institution "Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products" of the Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 17 Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 18 Central Drug Standards Control Organization (CDSCO), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
  • 19 Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Brasilia, Brazil
  • 20 National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Potters Bar, United Kingdom
  • 21 Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan
Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2021 05;1491(1):42-59.
PMID: 33222245 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14522

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines for the regulatory evaluation of biosimilars in 2009 and has provided considerable effort toward helping member states implement the evaluation principles in the guidelines into their regulatory practices. Despite this effort, a recent WHO survey (conducted in 2019-2020) has revealed four main remaining challenges: unavailable/insufficient reference products in the country; lack of resources; problems with the quality of some biosimilars (and even more with noninnovator products); and difficulties with the practice of interchangeability and naming of biosimilars. The following have been identified as opportunities/solutions for regulatory authorities to deal with the existing challenges: (1) exchange of information on products with other regulatory authorities and accepting foreign licensed and sourced reference products, hence avoiding conducting unnecessary (duplicate) bridging studies; (2) use of a "reliance" concept and/or joint review for the assessment and approval of biosimilars; (3) review and reassessment of the products already approved before the establishment of a regulatory framework for biosimilar approval; and (4) setting appropriate regulatory oversight for good pharmacovigilance, which is essential for the identification of problems with products and establishing the safety and efficacy of interchangeability of biosimilars.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.