Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Hepatology Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka Bangladesh
  • 2 Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • 3 Department of Hepatology Shaheed Syed Nazrul Islam Medical College Kishoreganj Bangladesh
  • 4 Department of Medical Gastroenterology Sheikh Russel National Gastroliver Institute and Hospital Dhaka Bangladesh
  • 5 Department of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA
  • 6 Meta analysis Division Pi Research Consultancy Center Dhaka Bangladesh
  • 7 Department of Medicine University Malaya Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
JGH Open, 2021 Nov;5(11):1236-1249.
PMID: 34816009 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12658

Abstract

The pathophysiology and risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) among lean patients is poorly understood and therefore investigated. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies. Of 1175 articles found through searching from Medline/PubMed, Banglajol, and Google Scholar by two independent investigators, 22 were selected. Data from lean (n = 6768) and obese (n = 9253) patients with NAFLD were analyzed; lean (n = 43 398) and obese (n = 9619) subjects without NAFLD served as controls. Age, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) had significantly higher estimates in lean NAFLD patients than in lean non-NAFLD controls. Fasting blood sugar [MD(mean difference) 5.17 mg/dl, 95% CI(confidence interval) 4.14-6.16], HbA1c [MD 0.29%, 95% CI 0.11-0.48], and insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] [MD 0.49 U, 95% CI 0.29-0.68]) were higher in lean NAFLD patients than in lean non-NAFLD controls. All components of the lipid profile were raised significantly in the former group except high-density lipoprotein. An increased uric acid (UA) level was found to be associated with the presence of NAFLD among lean. Cardio-metabolic profiles of nonlean NAFLD patients significantly differs from the counter group. However, the magnitude of the difference of lipid and glycemic profile barely reached statistical significance when subjects were grouped according to lean and nonlean NAFLD. But DBP (slope: 0.19, P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.