Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Lim SS, Tan PC, Sockalingam JK, Omar SZ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008 Feb;48(1):71-7.
    PMID: 18275575 DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00808.x
    To compare oral celecoxib with oral diclofenac as pain reliever after perineal repair following normal vaginal birth.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pyrazoles/administration & dosage*
  2. Tamilvanan S, Baskar R
    Pharm Dev Technol, 2013 Jul-Aug;18(4):761-71.
    PMID: 23668371 DOI: 10.3109/10837450.2011.586038
    Celecoxib (CXB, 0.2 g)-loaded anionic and cationic nanosized emulsions were prepared by a well-established combined emulsification method.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
  3. Dehghan F, Yusof A, Muniandy S, Salleh N
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol, 2015 Nov;40(3):785-91.
    PMID: 26447688 DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.004
    The high risk of knee injuries in female may be associated with sex-steroid hormone fluctuations during the menstrual cycle by its effect on ligaments and tendons stiffness. This study examined changes in knee range of motion in presence of estrogen and progesterone and investigated the interaction of their antagonists to relaxin receptors.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
  4. Lee HC, Hamzah H, Leong MP, Md Yusof H, Habib O, Zainal Abidin S, et al.
    Sci Rep, 2021 Feb 15;11(1):3847.
    PMID: 33589712 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83222-z
    Ruxolitinib is the first janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor that was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The drug targets the JAK/STAT signalling pathway, which is critical in regulating the gliogenesis process during nervous system development. In the study, we assessed the effect of non-maternal toxic dosages of ruxolitinib (0-30 mg/kg/day between E7.5-E20.5) on the brain of the developing mouse embryos. While the pregnant mice did not show any apparent adverse effects, the Gfap protein marker for glial cells and S100β mRNA marker for astrocytes were reduced in the postnatal day (P) 1.5 pups' brains. Gfap expression and Gfap+ cells were also suppressed in the differentiating neurospheres culture treated with ruxolitinib. Compared to the control group, adult mice treated with ruxolitinib prenatally showed no changes in motor coordination, locomotor function, and recognition memory. However, increased explorative behaviour within an open field and improved spatial learning and long-term memory retention were observed in the treated group. We demonstrated transplacental effects of ruxolitinib on astrogenesis, suggesting the potential use of ruxolitinib to revert pathological conditions caused by gliogenic-shift in early brain development such as Down and Noonan syndromes.
    Matched MeSH terms: Pyrazoles/administration & dosage*
  5. Shahnaz Syed Abd Kadir S, Christopeit M, Wulf G, Wagner E, Bornhauser M, Schroeder T, et al.
    Eur J Haematol, 2018 Sep;101(3):305-317.
    PMID: 29791053 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13099
    INTRODUCTION: Ruxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown.
    PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28-74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n = 23), matched (n = 86) or mismatched (n = 50) unrelated donors. Forty-six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT. The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (range 10-40 mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.9 months (range 0.4-39.1 months).
    RESULTS: Primary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non-ruxolitinib group. Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non-relapse mortality at 2 years (23% vs 23%). A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P = .2), resulting in a similar 2 year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively). No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
    Study site: 8 health clinics in Germany
    Matched MeSH terms: Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links