MyMedR

Fulltext Radiation exposure during fixation of femoral trochanteric fractures

Sidhu JS, Kadni T

Med J Malaysia, 1988 Jun;43(2):117-24.

PMID: 3237127

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control*

Personnel exposure during cerebral angiography

Lam ES

Med J Malaysia, 1979 Dec;34(2):171-3.

PMID: 548723

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control*

Fulltext Impact of treatment planning and delivery factors on gastrointestinal toxicity: an analysis of data from the RADAR prostate radiotherapy trial

Yahya N, Ebert MA, Bulsara M, Haworth A, Kearvell R, Foo K, et al.

Radiat Oncol, 2014;9:282.

PMID: 25498565 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0282-7

To assess the impact of incremental modifications of treatment planning and delivery technique, as well as patient anatomical factors, on late gastrointestinal toxicity using data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR prostate radiotherapy trial.

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control

Radiological emergency: Malaysian preparedness and response

Yusof MA, Ali HM

Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2011 Jul;146(1-3):38-41.

PMID: 21729940 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr102

Planning and preparation in advance for radiological emergencies can help to minimise potential public health and environmental threats if and when an actual emergency occurs. During the planning process, emergency response organisations think through how they would respond to each type of incident and the resources that will be needed. In Malaysia, planning, preparation for and response to radiological emergencies involve many parties. In the event of a radiological emergency and if it is considered a disaster, the National Security Council, the Atomic Energy Licensing Board and the Malaysian Nuclear Agency (Nuclear Malaysia) will work together with other federal agencies, state and local governments, first responders and international organisations to monitor the situation, contain the release, and clean up the contaminated site. Throughout the response, these agencies use their protective action guidelines. This paper discusses Malaysian preparedness for, and response to, any potential radiological emergency.

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control*

ASSESSMENT ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF PERSONAL EFFECTIVE DOSE ALGORITHMS IN FLUOROSCOPY-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS USING BLAND-ALTMAN ANALYSIS

Bohari A, Hashim S, Ghoshal SK, Mohd Mustafa SN

Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2019 Dec 31;186(4):462-468.

PMID: 31329977 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz051

Long exposure to radiation from fluoroscopy-guided interventions (FGIs) can be detrimental to both patients and radiologists. The effective doses received by the interventional radiology staff after performing 230 FGIs in a year were assessed by using double dosimetry and five various algorithms. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed normally-distributed data (p < 0.01), while the significant correlation coefficients between the effective doses ranged between 0.88 and 1.00. As for the Bland-Altman analysis, both Niklason and Boetticher algorithms strongly supported the absence of statistical significance between the estimated effective doses. This portrays that the occupational doses received by the interventional radiology staff during FGIs fall within the acceptable limit regardless of the varied algorithms applied. In short, the Niklason and Boetticher algorithms appeared to be the more interchangeable ones for effective evaluation of doses. This is in view of their strong mutual correlations and excellent agreement.

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control*

Influence of exposure and geometric parameters on absorbed doses associated with common neuro-interventional procedures

Safari MJ, Wong JHD, Jong WL, Thorpe N, Cutajar D, Rosenfeld A, et al.

Phys Med, 2017 Mar;35:66-72.

PMID: 28256398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.02.002

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of routine exposure parameters on patient's dose during neuro-interventional radiology procedures.

METHODS: We scrutinized the routine radiological exposure parameters during 58 clinical neuro-interventional procedures such as, exposure direction, magnification, frame rate, and distance between image receptor to patient's body and evaluate their effects on patient's dose using an anthropomorphic phantom. Radiation dose received by the occipital region, ears and eyes of the phantom were measured using MOSkin detectors.

RESULTS: DSA imaging technique is a major contributor to patient's dose (80.9%) even though they are used sparingly (5.3% of total frame number). The occipital region of the brain received high dose largely from the frontal tube constantly placed under couch (73.7% of the total KAP). When rotating the frontal tube away from under the couch, the radiation dose to the occipital reduced by 40%. The use of magnification modes could increase radiation dose by 94%. Changing the image receptor to the phantom surface distance from 10 to 40cm doubled the radiation dose received by the patient's skin at the occipital region.

CONCLUSION: Our findings provided important insights into the contribution of selected fluoroscopic exposure parameters and their impact on patient's dose during neuro-interventional radiology procedures. This study showed that the DSA imaging technique contributed to the highest patient's dose and judicial use of exposure parameters might assist interventional radiologists in effective skin and eye lens dose reduction for patients undergoing neuro-interventional procedures.

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control

Managing complications of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: Part II. Management of radiation-induced caries

Chai WL, Ngeow WC, Ramli R, Rahman RA

Singapore Dent J, 2006 Dec;28(1):4-6.

PMID: 17378334

Head and neck cancer is becoming a more recognizable pathology to the general population and dentists. The modes of treatment include surgery and/or radiation therapy. Where possible, pretreatment dental assessment shall be provided for these patients before they undergo radiation therapy. There are occasions, however, whereby head and neck cancer patients are not prepared optimally for radiation therapy. Because of this, they succumb to complicated oral complications after radiation therapy. The management of xerostomia has been reviewed in Part I of this series. In this article, the management of dental caries, a sequalae of xerostomia following radiation therapy is reviewed.

Matched MeSH terms: Radiation Injuries/prevention & control

Displaying all 7 publications