Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed; searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) included all randomized controlled trials and observational studies conducted in adult patients hospitalized in ICUs and evaluating standard care (STD), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), environmental cleaning (ENV), decolonization methods (DCL), or source control (SCT), simultaneously. The primary outcomes were MDR-GNB acquisition, colonization, and infection; secondary outcome was ICU mortality.
Results: Of 3805 publications retrieved, 42 met inclusion criteria (5 randomized controlled trials and 37 observational studies), involving 62068 patients (median age, 58.8 years; median APACHE [Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation] II score, 18.9). The majority of studies reported extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. Compared with STD, a 4-component strategy composed of STD, ASP, ENV, and SCT was the most effective intervention (rate ratio [RR], 0.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .01-.38]). When ENV was added to STD+ASP or SCT was added to STD+ENV, there was a significant reduction in the acquisition of MDR A. baumannii (RR, 0.28 [95% CI, .18-.43] and 0.48 [95% CI, .35-.66], respectively). Strategies with ASP as a core component showed a statistically significant reduction the acquisition of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (RR, 0.28 [95% CI, .11-.69] for STD+ASP+ENV and 0.23 [95% CI, .07-.80] for STD+ASP+DCL).
Conclusions: A 4-component strategy was the most effective intervention to prevent MDR-GNB acquisition. As some strategies were differential for certain bacteria, our study highlighted the need for further evaluation of the most effective prevention strategies.
METHODS: The antibacterial activity of four NSAIDs (aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac and mefenamic acid) were tested against ten pathogenic bacterial strains using the microdilution broth method. The interaction between NSAIDs and antibiotics (cefuroxime/chloramphenicol) was estimated by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration (FICI) of the combination.
RESULTS: Aspirin, ibuprofen and diclofenac exhibited antibacterial activity against the selected pathogenic bacteria. The interaction between ibuprofen/aspirin with cefuroxime was demonstrated to be synergistic against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and the MRSA reference strain, whereas for MRSA clinical strains additive effects were observed for both NSAIDs and cefuroxime combinations. The combination of chloramphenicol with ibuprofen/aspirin was synergistic against all of the tested MRSA strains and displayed an additive effect against MSSA. A 4-8192-fold reduction in the cefuroxime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and a 4-64-fold reduction of the chloramphenicol MIC were documented.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the NSAIDs ibuprofen and aspirin showed antibacterial activity against strains of S. aureus. Although individually less potent than common antibiotics, these NSAIDs are synergistic in action with cefuroxime and chloramphenicol and could potentially be used as adjuvants in combating multidrug-resistant MRSA.
AIM: This review highlights the anti-staphylococcal activities of pentacyclic triterpenoids, particularly α-amyrin (AM), betulinic acid (BA) and betulinaldehyde (BE). These compounds are based on a 30-carbon skeleton comprising five six-membered rings (ursanes and lanostanes) or four six-membered rings and one five-membered ring (lupanes and hopanes).
METHODS: Electronic databases such as ScienceDirect, PubMed and Scopus were used to search scientific contributions until March 2018, using relevant keywords. Literature focusing on the antimicrobial and antibiofilms of effects of pentacyclic triterpenoids on S. aureus were identified and summarized.
RESULTS: Pentacyclic triterpenoids can be divided into three representative classes, namely ursane, lupane and oleananes. This class of compounds have been shown to exhibit analgesic, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antifungal and antibacterial activities. In studies of the antimicrobial activities and targets of AM, BA and BE in sensitive and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, these compounds acted synergistically and have different targets from the conventional antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: The inhibitory mechanisms of S. aureus in novel targets and pathways should stimulate further researches to develop AM, BA and BE as therapeutic agents for infections caused by S. aureus. Continued efforts to identify and exploit synergistic combinations by the three compounds and peptidoglycan inhibitors, are also necessary as alternative treatment options for S. aureus infections.