Displaying all 7 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Yap PR, Mahadeva S, Goh KL
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2013 Nov;38(10):1321-2.
    PMID: 24134501 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12497
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy*
  2. Jaafar MH, Safi SZ, Tan MP, Rampal S, Mahadeva S
    Dig Dis Sci, 2018 05;63(5):1250-1260.
    PMID: 29192375 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4871-9
    OBJECTIVE: The role of gastritis in dyspepsia remains controversial. We aimed to examine the efficacy of rebamipide, a gastric mucosal protective agent, in both organic and functional dyspepsia.

    DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The following databases were searched using the keywords ("rebamipide" OR "gastroprotective agent*" OR "mucosta") AND ("dyspepsia" OR "indigestion" OR "gastrointestinal symptoms"): PubMed, Wed of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register. The primary outcome was dyspepsia or upper GI symptom score improvement. Pooled analysis of the main outcome data were presented as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data.

    RESULTS: From an initial 248 records, 17 randomised controlled trial (RCT) publications involving 2170 subjects (1224 rebamipide, 946 placebo/control) were included in the final analysis. Twelve RCTs were conducted in subjects with organic dyspepsia (peptic ulcer disease, reflux esophagitis or NSAID-induced gastropathy) and five RCTs were conducted in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Overall, dyspepsia symptom improvement was significantly better with rebamipide compared to placebo/control drug (RR 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93; SMD -0.46, 95% CI = -0.83 to -0.09). Significant symptom improvement was observed both in pooled RR and SMD in subjects with organic dyspepsia (RR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.61-0.86; SMD -0.23, 95% CI = -0.4 to -0.07), while symptom improvement in FD was observed in pooled SMD but not RR (SMD -0.62, 95% CI = -1.16 to -0.08; RR 1.01, 95% CI = 0.71-1.45).

    CONCLUSION: Rebamipide is effective in organic dyspepsia and may improve symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy*
  3. Goh KL, Parasakthi N, Peh SC, Wong NW, Lo YL, Puthucheary SD
    Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1991 Nov;26(11):1123-31.
    PMID: 1754846
    A study was undertaken to determine the role of Helicobacter pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and to determine the efficacy of colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) in the treatment of NUD. Seventy-one patients were randomly allocated (double blind) to CBS or placebo, two tablets twice daily for 4 weeks. The severity of dyspepsia was scored and endoscopies performed before and after treatment, and antral biopsy specimens were taken for bacteriologic and histologic examination. Forty patients had H. pylori infection, and all had changes of chronic active gastritis. H. pylori was cleared from 17 to 21 patients (81%) treated with CBS, whereas none of the 19 patients treated with placebo cleared the bacteria. Improvement in histology was noted in 15 of 21 patients (71.4%) treated with CBS, whereas no improvement was noted in any of the placebo controls. Thirty-one patients were negative for H. pylori. All had either normal gastric histology or minor degrees of inflammation. Seventeen of these patients received CBS, and 14 received placebo. All groups reported improvement in the symptom score; however, the H. pylori-positive, CBS-treated group recorded a significantly higher improvement than the other groups (p less than 0.001). Relapse of H. pylori infection after initial clearance of the bacteria was high. Twelve of 16 patients evaluated relapsed 1 month after withdrawal of CBS.
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy*
  4. Nafeeza MI, Shahimi MM, Kudva MV, Ahmad H, Isa MR, Sood IM, et al.
    Singapore Med J, 1992 Dec;33(6):570-4.
    PMID: 1488663
    This randomised double blind placebo controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS), ampicillin and their combination in the treatment of Helicobacter Pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and assessed if elimination of this organism is associated with improvement of gastritis and the symptoms. Forty-eight NUD patients with H. pylori and histologic gastritis were randomly allocated to one of the three regimens for 28 days. Symptoms were assessed before and after treatment. Forty-three patients completed the trial. Repeat endoscopy within 48 hours of completing treatment showed suppression of H. pylori in 6 of 7 patients (85.7%) on combined therapy and one of 8 patients (12.5%) on CBS therapy (p = 0.0205). There was no suppression of the bacteria in patients treated with ampicillin. Repeat endoscopy performed 2 weeks after completing treatment showed suppression of H. pylori in 3 of 7 patients (42.9%) on combined therapy and none in the other two groups. Patients on combined therapy who had suppression of H. pylori, 48 hours or 2 weeks after completing treatment were noted to have historical improvement of their gastritis (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.05 respectively). This was also associated with improvement of symptoms in these patients.
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy*
  5. Tan HJ, Rizal AM, Rosmadi MY, Goh KL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006 Jan;21(1 Pt 1):110-5.
    PMID: 16706821
    The role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) in non-ulcer dyspepsia is debatable. Eradicating HP will help a small group of non-ulcer dyspeptic patients. However, it is unclear which subgroup of patients will benefit from eradication therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the cagA and cagE status, as well as vacA genotypes, of HP in non-ulcer dyspeptic patients who responded successfully to eradication therapy compared with those patients who did not.
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy*
  6. Mahadeva S, Yadav H, Everett SM, Goh KL
    Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2011 Sep;23(9):846-53.
    PMID: 21740483 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01746.x
    BACKGROUND:
    Dyspepsia is a common, chronic condition but medical consultation rates for symptoms remain variable. We aimed to examine two populations with varied health-care provision to determine predictive factors for dyspepsia-related consultation.

    METHODS:
    A cross-sectional, population-based study in both an urban and a rural community within a single Asian country was conducted. Details on dyspepsia-related consultation rates over a fixed period and independent factors influencing them were identified.

    KEY RESULTS:
    A total of 4039/5370 (75.2%) adults from representative rural and urban areas in this country agreed to participate in the study. Although mean ages of respondents were similar (40.4years), the demographics of both populations varied in terms of gender (62.7% female, rural vs 55.7% female, urban, P<0.0001), marital status (75.4% rural vs 70.5% urban, P=0.002), ethnicity, (79% Malay rural vs 45.3% Malays urban, P<0.0001) and socio-economic status (professional occupation 7.1% rural vs 47.3% urban, P<0.0001). Dyspepsia-related consultation rates were found to be higher among rural compared to urban adults (41.4%vs 28.7%, P<0.0001). Over-the-counter medication consumption was higher among urban compared to rural dyspepsia sufferers (n=157 vs n=35, P<0.0001). Following logistic regression, rural population (OR 3.14, 95% CI=1.65-6.0), low quality of life (OR 1.90, 95% CI=1.17-3.10), and self-medication (OR 0.40, 95% CI=0.25-0.62) were found to independently predict dyspepsia-related consultation.

    CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES:
    Dyspepsia-related consultation varied significantly between urban and rural communities. Factors within the rural population, self-medication practices, and a low quality of life independently influenced dyspepsia-related consultation.
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy
  7. Mahadeva S, Chia YC, Vinothini A, Mohazmi M, Goh KL
    Gut, 2008 Sep;57(9):1214-20.
    PMID: 18441005 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2007.147728
    To compare a Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" strategy with prompt endoscopy in young Asians with dyspepsia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Dyspepsia/drug therapy
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links