METHODS: This was a prospective non randomized clinical trial conducted on 31 patients with diabetes mellitus with high risk foot (King's classification stage II) over a 12 weeks period. Dynamic foot plantar pressure reading was recorded at day 0, 6 weeks and 12 weeks intervals, both barefoot and with StepEase™, using Novel Pedar-X system (Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany). Patients' satisfaction and usage practice were assessed by a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 57.9 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m2. The mean duration of diagnosis with diabetes mellitus was 10.2 years. The mean peak plantar pressure was found to be highest at the right forefoot and left heel region, 267.6 kPa (SD113.5 kPa) and 266.3 kPa (SD 94.6 kPa) respectively. There was a statistically significant reduction of mean peak pressure (P foot pressure relieving footwear. It resulted in significant peak plantar pressure reduction by up to 49.2% and the effect was maintained for at least 12 weeks duration.
METHODS: High-frequency ultrasound (HFU) images of 30 wounds were acquired in a controlled environment on post-debridement days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Meaningful features portraying changes in structure and intensity of echoes during healing were extracted from the images, their relevance and discriminatory power being verified by analysis of variance. Relative analysis of tissue healing was conducted by developing a features-based healing function, optimised using the pattern-search method. Its performance was investigated through leave-one-out cross-validation technique and reconfirmed using principal component analysis.
RESULTS: The constructed healing function could depict tissue changes during healing with 87.8% accuracy. The first principal component derived from the extracted features demonstrated similar pattern to the constructed healing function, accounting for 86.3% of the data variance.
CONCLUSION: The developed wound analysis technique could be a viable tool in quantitative assessment of diabetic foot ulcers during healing.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised controlled trial. We recruited diabetic patients aged > 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III, who were scheduled for unilateral diabetic foot surgery below the knee. All patients were assessed for autonomic dysfunction using the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms score. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either PNB or SAB for the surgery. Hemodynamic data, including usage of vasopressors, were recorded at 5-min intervals for up to 1 h after the induction of anesthesia. Pain scores were recorded postoperatively, and follow-up was done via telephone 6 months later.
RESULTS: Compared to the PNB group, the SAB group had a larger number of patients with significant hypotension (14 vs. 1; p = 0.001) and more patients who required vasopressor boluses (6 vs. 0 patients). Compared to SAB group, the patients in the PNB group had a longer postoperative pain-free duration (9 vs. 4.54 h; p = 0.002) and lower pain scores 1 day after surgery (3.63 vs. 4.69; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve block should be considered, whenever possible, as the first option of anesthesia for lower limb surgery in diabetic patients as it provides hemodynamic stability and superior postoperative pain control compared to SAB.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. ID NCT02727348.