Displaying all 10 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Wong, W. H., Lim, T. A., Lim, K. Y.
    MyJurnal
    Introduction: Giving two intravenous anaesthetic agents simultaneously generally results in an additive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction between propofol and thiopental when given to patients who have had sedative premedication. Methods: Fifty patients were admitted into the study. All patients received oral midazolam 3.75 mg and intravenous fentanyl 100 mg before induction of anaesthesia. Twenty patients received an infusion of either propofol or thiopental while 30 patients received an infusion of an admixture of both drugs. Isobolographic analysis was used to determine the interaction between the two drugs. Results: The interaction between propofol and thiopental was
    additive. The average dose at loss of the eyelash reflex for propofol and thiopental was 0.71 mg kg-1 and 1.54 mg kg-1 respectively. Premedication decreased the induction dose by 38.2%. Conclusion: Propofol and thiopental interact in an additive fashion when given at induction of anaesthesia.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication
  2. Ng NK, Sivalingam N
    Med J Malaysia, 1992 Dec;47(4):273-9.
    PMID: 1303479
    A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted over a 6 month period on the value of administering prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing emergency caesarean section at the Ipoh General Hospital. A total of 222 patients were randomised to receive 24 hours of ampicillin (500 mg per dose), cefoperazone (1 gm per dose) or no antibiotics. In all parameters of patient morbidity, the group receiving cefoperazone showed significantly better results as compared to the group not receiving antibiotics. The ampicillin group also had favourable results but generally not achieving statistical significance. Prophylactic antibiotics appear to be beneficial and consideration should be given to make it a routine in all emergency caesarean sections.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication*
  3. Lim SK, Elegbe EO
    Singapore Med J, 1992 Dec;33(6):608-10.
    PMID: 1488672
    The efficacy of a single oral dose of 0.3M of sodium citrate alone as a prophylaxis against acid aspiration syndrome in obstetric patients undergoing LSCS (elective and emergency) was compared with that of intravenous ranitidine. One group of patients was given 30 ml of 0.3M sodium citrate orally just before the induction of anaesthesia while the other group was given 50mg of ranitidine intravenously together with the 30ml of 0.3M sodium citrate. This was done for both the elective and the emergency groups of patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pH of the gastric aspirate obtained from those given sodium citrate alone and those given sodium citrate and ranitidine in either the elective or the emergency group. However, in the emergency group, those who were given sodium citrate alone tend to have a larger volume of gastric aspiration when compared with those given ranitidine together with the sodium citrate. There were significantly more patients with gastric aspirates of more than 25ml in the emergency group to which sodium citrate alone was given. It would appear that supplementing an intravenous dose of ranitidine with the oral dose of sodium citrate is useful in emergency LSCS as a prophylaxis against acid aspiration syndrome.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication*
  4. Loh SP
    Med J Malaysia, 1993 Jun;48(2):207-10.
    PMID: 8350797
    Eight patients underwent major gynaecological operations. Their post-operative analgesia was provided by epidural buprenorphine 0.15 mg and bupivacaine 0.5%. The efficacy and side-effects of this combination were assessed. All patients had satisfactory analgesia ranging in duration from 10 hours to greater than 36 hours after a single dose injection. No significant side-effect was noted.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication
  5. Lim VK, Cheong YM, Suleiman AB
    PMID: 7667716
    A survey on the use of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis was carried out in seven Malaysian hospitals. Details of antibiotic prescriptions were obtained through questionnaires completed by the prescriber. A total of 430 such prescriptions was analysed. A large number of different antibiotic regimens were used for a variety of surgical procedures. The majority of prescriptions (70%) were issued for procedures where such prophylaxis was probably not necessary. Antibiotics were also often prescribed for durations that were longer than necessary. There is an urgent need to educate surgeons and standardize surgical prophylactic regimens in order to reduce cost and combat the emergence of antibiotic resistance.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication*
  6. Kotirum S, Chongmelaxme B, Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2017 Feb;43(2):252-262.
    PMID: 27704332 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1433-5
    To analyze the cost-utility of oral dabigatran etexilate, enoxaparin sodium injection, and no intervention for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR) surgery among Thai patients. A cost-utility analysis using a decision tree model was conducted using societal and healthcare payers' perspectives to simulate relevant costs and health outcomes covering a 3-month time horizon. Costs were adjusted to year 2014. The willingness-to-pay threshold of THB 160,000 (USD 4926) was used. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. Compared with no VTE prophylaxis, dabigatran and enoxaparin after THR and TKR surgery incurred higher costs and increased quality adjusted life years (QALYs). However, their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were high above the willingness to pay. Compared with enoxaparin, dabigatran for THR/TKR lowered VTE complications but increased bleeding cases; dabigatran was cost-saving by reducing the costs [by THB 3809.96 (USD 117.30) for THR] and producing more QALYs gained (by 0.00013 for THR). Dabigatran (vs. enoxaparin) had a 98 % likelihood of being cost effective. Dabigatran is cost-saving compared to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after THR or TKR under the Thai context. However, both medications are not cost-effective compared to no thromboprophylaxis.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication/economics
  7. Nabishah BM, Merican Z, Morat PB, Alias AK, Khalid BA
    Gen. Pharmacol., 1990;21(6):935-8.
    PMID: 2177714
    1. Steroid hormones have been shown to regulate the concentration of adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in many tissues. 2. The cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) content in rat lung tissues in response to either dexamethasone, corticosterone, deoxycorticosterone or progesterone for 7 days were measured following intraperitoneal injection of isoprenaline just before sacrificed. 3. There was a significant increase in cAMP level (P less than 0.001) in dexamethasone and corticosterone-treated rats compared to controls that received isoprenaline alone. 4. Pretreatment with deoxycorticosterone and progesterone suppressed the increase in cAMP in response to isoprenaline. 5. The effect of glucocorticoids in causing bronchodilatation in asthmatic patients is partly due to the restoration of adenyl cyclase responsiveness to beta-agonist.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication
  8. Visvanathan R
    Singapore Med J, 1994 Feb;35(1):108-9.
    PMID: 8009268
    The primary closure of a rectus sheath muscle abscess was performed on an 11-year-old child following evacuation of its contents under antimicrobial cover. Complete healing was achieved in eight days. This method avoids the delays in wound healing and morbidity associated with conventional drainage and shortens convalescence.
    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication
  9. Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Jinatongthai P, Veettil SK, Teerawattanapong N, Gutmann JL
    J Endod, 2019 Apr;45(4):364-371.
    PMID: 30737050 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.10.016
    INTRODUCTION: This review aimed to find the most effective oral premedication in reducing pain in adults after nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT) using network meta-analysis.

    METHODS: The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017071899). A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and EBSCOhost databases until June 2017 with no language restriction. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of oral premedications, whether given alone or in combination, compared with other agents, placebo, or no treatment in adult patients before NSRCT for postoperative pain were included. Nonintervention studies, nonendodontic studies, animal studies, and reviews were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pair-wise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and quality of evidence assessment using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was performed.

    RESULTS: Eleven studies comparing pharmacologic groups of medications were included in the primary analysis. Compared with placebo, corticosteroids (prednisolone 30-40 mg) was ranked best for reducing postoperative pain (median difference [MD] = -18.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), -32.90 to -3.37] for the pain score at 6 hours; MD = -22.17 [95% CI, -36.03 to -8.32] for the pain score at 12 hours; and MD = -21.50 [95% CI, -37.95 to -5.06] for the pain score at 24 hours). However, the evidence was very low (6 and 24 hours) to moderate quality (12 hours). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were ranked least among the medications, and the quality of this evidence was very low. Additional analysis based on the chemical name showed that sulindac, ketorolac, and ibuprofen significantly reduced pain at 6 hours, whereas piroxicam and prednisolone significantly reduced the pain at 12 and 24 hours. Etodolac was found to be least effective in reducing pain. Overall, the evidence was of moderate to very low quality.

    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited and low-quality evidence, oral premedication with piroxicam or prednisolone could be recommended for controlling postoperative pain after NSRCT. However, more trials are warranted to confirm the results with a higher quality of evidence.

    Matched MeSH terms: Premedication*
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links