Displaying publications 1 - 20 of 39 in total

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Jin J, Akau Ola S, Yip CH, Nthumba P, Ameh EA, de Jonge S, et al.
    World J Surg, 2021 10;45(10):2993-3006.
    PMID: 34218314 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06208-y
    BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality in surgical systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain high compared to high-income countries. Quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure are essential in the effort to improve peri-operative outcomes.

    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies assessing quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure in developing country surgical systems was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they were conducted in an LMIC, occurred in a surgical setting, and measured the effect of an implementation and its impact. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were rates of rates of hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and surgical site infections (SSI). Prospero Registration: CRD42020171542.

    RESULT: Of 38,273 search results, 31 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis, and 28 articles were included in a meta-analysis. Implementation of multimodal bundled interventions reduced the incidence of HAI by a relative risk (RR) of 0.39 (95%CI 0.26 to 0.59), the effect of hand hygiene interventions on HAIs showed a non-significant effect of RR of 0.69 (0.46-1.05). The WHO Safe Surgery Checklist reduced mortality by RR 0.68 (0.49 to 0.95) and SSI by RR 0.50 (0.33 to 0.63) and antimicrobial stewardship interventions reduced SSI by RR 0.67 (0.48-0.93).

    CONCLUSION: There is evidence that a number of quality improvement processes, interventions and structural changes can improve mortality, HAI and SSI outcomes in the peri-operative setting in LMICs.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
  2. Aziz Z, Abu SF, Chong NJ
    Burns, 2012 May;38(3):307-18.
    PMID: 22030441 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.020
    Silver preparations are commonly used for burns, but evidence of their effectiveness remains poorly defined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of silver-containing dressings and topical silver for preventing infection and promoting healing in burns wounds through a meta-analysis of the available evidence. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and relevant databases were searched. Drug companies and experts in this field were also contacted. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of silver dressings or topical silver (used with dressings) compared with non-silver dressings were eligible for inclusion. We identified 14 RCTs involving 877 participants. One small trial of a silver-containing dressing showed significantly better healing time compared to the control [MD -3.6; 95% CI -4.94 to -2.26 for partial thickness burns and MD -3.9; 95% CI -4.54 to -3.26 for superficial burns]. Topical silver showed significantly worse healing time compared to the non-silver group [WMD 3.96; 95% CI 2.41-5.51] and showed no evidence of effectiveness in preventing wounds infection [WMD 2.48; 95% CI 0.39-15.73]. Our review suggests that silver-containing dressings and topical silver were either no better or worse than control dressings in preventing wound infection and promoting healing of burn wounds.
    Matched MeSH terms: Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  3. Yeap JS, Lim JW, Vergis M, Au Yeung PS, Chiu CK, Singh H
    Med J Malaysia, 2006 Jun;61(2):181-8.
    PMID: 16898309
    The national clinical practice guideline has recommended that prophylactic antibiotic be given in orthopaedic surgery involving joint replacements and internal fixation of fractures. The aim of this study is to assess the current antibiotics prophylaxis practice in a state level hospital. One hundred and three patients (68 males, 35 females; mean age 41.6 +/- 22.2 years) undergoing internal fixation for closed fractures and joint replacement surgery were included in this prospective study. The choice of pre and post-operative antibiotics, their dosages and duration of administration were recorded. The pre-operative antibiotics were only deemed to have been given if it was documented in the case notes and in the case of post-operative antibiotics if it was signed on the drug chart. Eighty eight percent were given pre-operative prophylactic antibiotics and 92% were given post-operative antibiotics. For patients undergoing internal fixation of fractures, the most commonly used antibiotic for both pre and post-op is intravenous cefuroxime. For joint replacement surgery, the most commonly used antibiotic is intravenous cefoperazone. The duration or number of doses of post-operative antibiotics was highly variable. It was not stated in 56% of the post-operative instructions. Post-operative antibiotic was ordered for 48 hours or longer in 10%. In conclusion, prophylactic antibiotics appear to be widely practised. The first line antibiotics as recommended by the present guideline were not given in any of the patients. Second generation followed by third generation cephalosporins are the most popular antibiotics, with a trend towards using third generation cephalosporins in arthroplasty patients. Single dose prophylaxis was rarely practised.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  4. Abdullah J, Rushdan A, Hamzah M, Ariff AR, Rani A
    Ann. Transplant., 1999;4(3-4):28-31.
    PMID: 10853777
    Four patients underwent reconstruction of anterior cranial fossa of skull defects between November 1997 and January 1998. All of them had traumatic anterior cranial fossa defect and were reconstructed with lyophilised bovine cortical bone graft. There was no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, meningitis, extradural abscess or other infections. This study demonstrates that the use of bovine bone graft in the reconstruction of anterior base defects is safe.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
  5. Ng NK, Sivalingam N
    Med J Malaysia, 1992 Dec;47(4):273-9.
    PMID: 1303479
    A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted over a 6 month period on the value of administering prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing emergency caesarean section at the Ipoh General Hospital. A total of 222 patients were randomised to receive 24 hours of ampicillin (500 mg per dose), cefoperazone (1 gm per dose) or no antibiotics. In all parameters of patient morbidity, the group receiving cefoperazone showed significantly better results as compared to the group not receiving antibiotics. The ampicillin group also had favourable results but generally not achieving statistical significance. Prophylactic antibiotics appear to be beneficial and consideration should be given to make it a routine in all emergency caesarean sections.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  6. Dhillon KS, Kok CS
    Med J Malaysia, 1995 Sep;50(3):237-40.
    PMID: 8926901
    With the increase in the number of orthopaedic surgeons and the aggressive marketing by manufacturing companies, high technology orthopaedic surgery is being more frequently carried out in Malaysia. Post-operative sepsis complicating this type of surgery can have disastrous consequences. No data is available in this country on the incidence of post-operative infection in Orthopaedic Surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of post-operative infection. A retrospective survey of 703 patients undergoing elective Orthopaedic Surgery in the year 1991 was carried out. We found an overall post-operative infection rate of 6.8% and a deep infection rate of 3.3%. This figure of 3.3% is higher than the internationally accepted figure of less than 2%. A need for ongoing surveillance and concerned effort to reduce the infection rate is stressed.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
  7. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon JK, Wa CTC, Villa MA
    Int J Surg, 2017 Aug;44:260-268.
    PMID: 28648795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073
    BACKGROUND: Of the many antimicrobial agents available, iodophore-based formulations such as povidone iodine have remained popular after decades of use for antisepsis and wound healing applications due to their favorable efficacy and tolerability. Povidone iodine's broad spectrum of activity, ability to penetrate biofilms, lack of associated resistance, anti-inflammatory properties, low cytotoxicity and good tolerability have been cited as important factors, and no negative effect on wound healing has been observed in clinical practice. Over the past few decades, numerous reports on the use of povidone iodine have been published, however, many of these studies are of differing design, endpoints, and quality. More recent data clearly supports its use in wound healing.

    METHODS: Based on data collected through PubMed using specified search criteria based on above topics and clinical experience of the authors, this article will review preclinical and clinical safety and efficacy data on the use of povidone iodine in wound healing and its implications for the control of infection and inflammation, together with the authors' advice for the successful treatment of acute and chronic wounds.

    RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Povidone iodine has many characteristics that position it extraordinarily well for wound healing, including its broad antimicrobial spectrum, lack of resistance, efficacy against biofilms, good tolerability and its effect on excessive inflammation. Due to its rapid, potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, and favorable risk/benefit profile, povidone iodine is expected to remain a highly effective treatment for acute and chronic wounds in the foreseeable future.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  8. Menon RK, Gopinath D, Li KY, Leung YY, Botelho MG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019 Feb;48(2):263-273.
    PMID: 30145064 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.08.002
    The objectives of this systematic review were to investigate the efficacy of amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for reducing the risk of postoperative infection after third molar surgery and to evaluate the adverse outcomes in these patients, as well as in healthy volunteers. A systematic search of four databases was performed on May 26, 2017. Eleven studies qualified for the qualitative analysis and eight were found suitable for meta-analysis. The results suggest that both amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and amoxicillin significantly reduce the risk of infection after third molar extraction (overall relative risk (RR) 0.25, P<0.001). However, with the exclusion of randomized controlled trials with a split-mouth design (due to an inadequate crossover period after antibiotic treatment), only amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was found to be effective (RR 0.21, P<0.001). The risk of adverse effects was significantly higher in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group (RR=4.12, P=0.023) than in the amoxicillin group (RR 1.57, P=0.405). In conclusion, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and amoxicillin may significantly reduce the risk of infection after third molar extraction. However, their use in third molar surgery should be viewed with caution, as recent clinical trials on healthy volunteers have shown evidence of the negative impact of amoxicillin use on bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  9. Haque M, McKimm J, Godman B, Abu Bakar M, Sartelli M
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2019 01;19(1):81-92.
    PMID: 30394844 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1544497
    Introduction: Surgery in patients with head and neck cancers is frequently complicated by multiple stages of procedure that includes significant surgical removal of all or part of an organ with cancer, tissue reconstruction, and extensive neck dissection. Postoperative wound infections, termed 'surgical site infections' (SSIs) are a significant impediment to head-and-neck cancer surgery and recovery, and need to be addressed. Areas covered: Approximately 10-45% of patients undergoing head-and-neck cancers surgery develop SSIs. SSIs can lead to delayed wound healing, increased morbidity and mortality as well as costs. Consequently, SSIs need to be avoided where possible, as even the surgery itself impacts on patients' subsequent activities and their quality of life, which is exacerbated by SSIs. Several risk factors for SSIs need to be considered to reduce future rates, and care is also needed in the selection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Expert commentary: Head and neck surgeons should give personalized care especially to patients at high risk of SSIs. Such patients include those who have had chemoradiotherapy and need reconstructive surgery, and patients from lower and middle-income countries and from poorer communities in high income countries, who often have high levels of co-morbidity because of resource constraints.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  10. Ling ML, Apisarnthanarak A, Abbas A, Morikane K, Lee KY, Warrier A, et al.
    PMID: 31749962 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0638-8
    Background: The Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control (APSIC) launched the APSIC Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in 2018. This document describes the guidelines and recommendations for the setting prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). It aims to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist healthcare facilities at Asia Pacific region in achieving high standards in preoperative, perioperative and postoperative practices.

    Method: The guidelines were developed by an appointed workgroup comprising experts in the Asia Pacific region, following reviews of previously published guidelines and recommendations relevant to each section.

    Results: It recommends that healthcare facilities review specific risk factors and develop effective prevention strategies, which would be cost effective at local levels. Gaps identified are best closed using a quality improvement process. Surveillance of SSIs is recommended using accepted international methodology. The timely feedback of the data analysed would help in the monitoring of effective implementation of interventions.

    Conclusions: Healthcare facilities should aim for excellence in safe surgery practices. The implementation of evidence-based practices using a quality improvement process helps towards achieving effective and sustainable results.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  11. Nwachukwu I, Visa A, Holbrook C, Tan YW
    Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2024 Apr;25(3):185-191.
    PMID: 38394295 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.248
    Background: To determine risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in infants after stoma closure, to identify at-risk patients, plan timing of surgery, and implement SSI-reduction strategies. Patients and Methods: A single center retrospective comparison study of all children less than one year of age who underwent enterostomy closure (2018-2020) with SSI diagnosed through a prospective surveillance program, using criteria from Public Health England (PHE). Demographics and risk factors, types of SSI, systemic sepsis, mortality and length of stay were compared between SSI and non-SSI. Significant factors associated with SSI were analyzed in a multivariate binomial logistic regression model. Results: Eighty-nine stoma closures were performed, most commonly for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and anorectal malformation. Fourteen had SSI (16%): 12 superficial and two deep; three developed systemic sepsis, but no 30-day mortality. Surgical site infection was associated with NEC (12/14 vs. 32/75; p = 0.003), younger age (median 76 vs. 89 days; p = 0.014), lower corrected gestation (cutoff: 39 weeks gestation; 11/14 vs. 27/75; p = 0.004) and lower weight (cutoff: 2.2 kg; 7/14 vs. 16/75; p = 0.032), compared with non-SSI. After correcting for age, gestation, and weight, logistic regression showed NEC was an independent predictor for SSI (odds ratio [OR], 12; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.2-125). The at-risk cohort (n = 56; 63%) had seven-fold increased risk of SSI and four-fold longer hospital stay, which may be the target for SSI-reduction strategies. Conclusions: Necrotizing enterocolitis-related stoma closure is at increased risk for SSI. Considerations for delaying stoma closure until achieving 39 weeks gestation or 2.2 kg in weight may further reduce SSI. Targeting SSI-reduction strategies using these criteria may improve resource-rationalization.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
  12. Sinniah D
    Med J Malaya, 1971 Dec;26(2):84-9.
    PMID: 4260865
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control; Wound Infection/prevention & control
  13. Wong TW, Ramli NA
    Carbohydr Polym, 2014 Nov 4;112:367-75.
    PMID: 25129756 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.002
    Infection control and wound healing profiles of sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) films were investigated as a function of their anti-bacterial action, physical structures, polymer molecular weights and carboxymethyl substitution degrees. The films were prepared with in vitro polymer/film and in vivo microbe-colonized wound healing/systemic infection profiles examined. Adhesive high carboxymethyl substituted SCMC films aided healing via attaching to microbes and removing them from wound. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was removed via encapsulating in gelling low molecular weight SCMC film, whereas Staphylococcus aureus was trapped in tight folds of high molecular weight SCMC film. Incomplete microbe removal from wound did not necessary translate to inability to heal as microbe remnant at wound induced fibroblast migration and aided tissue reconstruction. Using no film nonetheless will cause systemic blood infection. SCMC films negate infection and promote wound healing via specific polymer-microbe adhesion, and removal of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa requires films of different polymer characteristics.
    Matched MeSH terms: Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  14. Oh AL, Goh LM, Nik Azim NA, Tee CS, Shehab Phung CW
    J Infect Dev Ctries, 2014 Feb;8(2):193-201.
    PMID: 24518629 DOI: 10.3855/jidc.3076
    INTRODUCTION: The widespread and inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis has led to reduced treatment efficacy, increased healthcare costs, and antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to explore the adherence of antibiotic usage in surgical prophylaxis to the national antibiotic guideline and the incidences of surgical site infection (SSI).
    METHODOLOGY: A three-month prospective observational study has been conducted in the surgical wards of Sarawak General Hospital (SGH) using a standardized surveillance form. Each patient was reviewed for up to 30 days post-operatively to determine the occurrence of SSI.
    RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included within the study period. The majority of the cases were clean-contaminated wounds (60.9%). Most were hepatobiliary cases (37.9%), followed by colorectal cases (19.5%). The most preferred antibiotic used was cefoperazone (63.2%). The choices of antibiotics in 78.2% of the cases were consistent with the guideline. Around 80% of prophylactic antibiotics were given within one hour before operation and 27.6% were omitted from intraoperative re-dosing. Prophylactic antibiotics were discontinued within 24 hours post-operatively in 77% of the cases. Of those continued for > 24 hours, the majority (60%) were administered for unknown reasons. SSI was documented in 13.8% of the total cases studied. However, there was no significant association between choices of antibiotics and timing of surgical prophylaxis with SSI (p = 0.299 and p = 0.258 respectively).
    CONCLUSION: Overall guideline adherence rate was more than 70%. Areas of non-concordance to the guideline require further investigation.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  15. Cheng KP, Roslani AC, Sehha N, Kueh JH, Law CW, Chong HY, et al.
    Colorectal Dis, 2012 Jun;14(6):e346-51.
    PMID: 22568647 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02943.x
    Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a common postoperative morbidity, particularly in colorectal resections, and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare system. The omission of mechanical bowel preparation, as is performed in enhanced recovery after surgery programmes, appears to further increase the incidence. Various wound protection methods have been devised to reduce the incidence of SSIs. However, there are few randomized controlled trials assessing their efficacy. The aim of this study is to investigate whether ALEXIS wound retractors with reinforced O-rings are superior to conventional wound protection methods in preventing SSIs in colorectal resections.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  16. Praveen S, Rohaizak M
    Asian J Surg, 2009 Jan;32(1):59-63.
    PMID: 19321405 DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60011-7
    Antibiotic prophylaxis for inguinal hernioplasty is still practiced in many hospitals to prevent consequences of infected mesh, mesh removal and hernia recurrence. The common route of administration is intravenous. However this method can be associated with systemic side effects. Alternatively, locally applied antibiotics have been used and proven to significantly reduce the infection rate after inguinal hernioplasty.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  17. Dorai AA, Lim CK, Fareha AC, Halim AS
    Med J Malaysia, 2008 Jul;63 Suppl A:44.
    PMID: 19024976
    The treatment of major burn injuries are a formidable challenge to the burn surgeon. Early aggressive surgery for deep to full thickness burn injuries is vital in the prevention of infection. The ultimate goal in major burn injuries is to prevent the onset of multi-resistant organisms and achieve early wound cover. The field of tissue engineering can help to expedite the healing of these burn wounds. The development of keratinocyte culture delivery system can be used clinically to fasten the healing process and save many lives.
    Matched MeSH terms: Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  18. Mahadeva S, Sam IC, Khoo BL, Khoo PS, Goh KL
    Int J Clin Pract, 2009 May;63(5):760-5.
    PMID: 19222613 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01881.x
    Current recommendations for the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion may not be suitable in all situations.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
  19. Gul YA, Lian LH, Jabar FM, Moissinac K
    ANZ J Surg, 2002 Apr;72(4):275-8.
    PMID: 11982514
    Antibiotics are often administered in elective colorectal surgery to prevent wound infection. The tendency for surgeons to prolong the administration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the postoperative period is a well-known fact. The aim of this study was to elucidate the pattern of prophylactic antibiotic utilization in elective colorectal surgery and to determine if evidence-based medicine is employed in relation to this practice.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links