Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET), Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh. Electronic address: sarfarazadnan@cuet.ac.bd
  • 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Presidency University, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. Electronic address: zakaria.siam@northsouth.edu
  • 3 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology (CUET), Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh. Electronic address: irfatkabir@gmail.com
  • 4 School of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Newcastle NSW-2258, Australia. Electronic address: Zobaidul.Kabir@newcatstle.edu.au
  • 5 Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address: mohammad.ahmed2@ucalgary.ca
  • 6 Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address: qhassan@ucalgary.ca
  • 7 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Electronic address: rashedur.rahman@northsouth.edu
  • 8 Spatial Sciences Discipline, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Australia. Electronic address: A.Dewan@curtin.edu.au
J Environ Manage, 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116813.
PMID: 36435143 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116813

Abstract

Globally, many studies on machine learning (ML)-based flood susceptibility modeling have been carried out in recent years. While majority of those models produce reasonably accurate flood predictions, the outcomes are subject to uncertainty since flood susceptibility models (FSMs) may produce varying spatial predictions. However, there have not been many attempts to address these uncertainties because identifying spatial agreement in flood projections is a complex process. This study presents a framework for reducing spatial disagreement among four standalone and hybridized ML-based FSMs: random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and hybridized genetic algorithm-gaussian radial basis function-support vector regression (GA-RBF-SVR). Besides, an optimized model was developed combining the outcomes of those four models. The southwest coastal region of Bangladesh was selected as the case area. A comparable percentage of flood potential area (approximately 60% of the total land areas) was produced by all ML-based models. Despite achieving high prediction accuracy, spatial discrepancy in the model outcomes was observed, with pixel-wise correlation coefficients across different models ranging from 0.62 to 0.91. The optimized model exhibited high prediction accuracy and improved spatial agreement by reducing the number of classification errors. The framework presented in this study might aid in the formulation of risk-based development plans and enhancement of current early warning systems.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.