Affiliations 

  • 1 Orthodontics, Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia
  • 2 Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, 89660Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia
  • 3 Department of Clinical Sciences, Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • 4 Practicing in Dental Clinic, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 377163School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • 6 Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • 7 Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia
  • 8 Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Saudi Arabia
  • 9 308732College of Dentistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Sci Prog, 2023;106(1):368504231156297.
PMID: 36803068 DOI: 10.1177/00368504231156297

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to strengthen the credibility of primary research results by combining open-source scientific material, namely a comparison of craniofacial features (Cfc) between Crouzon's syndrome (CS) patients and non-CS populations. All articles published up to October 7, 2021, were included in the search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this study. PECO framework was applied in the following ways: Those who have CS are denoted by the letter P, those who have been diagnosed with CS via clinical or genetic means by the letter E, those who do not have CS by the letter C, and those who have a Cfc of CS by the letter O. Independent reviewers collected the data and ranked the publications based on their adherence to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A total of six case-control studies were reviewed for this meta-analysis. Due to the large variation in cephalometric measures, only those published in at least two previous studies were included. This analysis found that CS patients had a smaller skull and mandible volumes than those without CS.in terms of SNA° (MD = -2.33, p = <0.001, I2 = 83.6%) and ANB°(MD = -1.89, p = <0.005, I2 = 93.1%)), as well as ANS (MD = -1.87, p = 0.001, I2 = 96.5%)) and SN/PP (MD = -1.99, p = 0.036, I2 = 77.3%)). In comparison to the general population, people with CS tend to have shorter and flatter cranial bases, smaller orbital volumes, and cleft palates. They differ from the general population in having a shorter skull base and more V-shaped maxillary arches.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.