Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, University Hospital Galway and Physics, School of Natural Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
  • 2 National Cancer Institute, Mexico City 07760, Mexico
  • 3 Instituto de Física, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), R. do Matao, 1371-Butanta, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
  • 4 European Georges Pompidou Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
  • 5 National Cancer Institute, University of Gezira, Wad Madani 11111, Sudan
  • 6 National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
  • 7 Fundación Médica de Río Negro y Neuquén-Leben Salud, Cipolleti R8324, Argentina
  • 8 Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
  • 9 University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
  • 10 Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
  • 11 Institute of Occupational Safety, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 12 Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1220 Vienna, Austria
J Clin Med, 2024 Aug 22;13(16).
PMID: 39201109 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164967

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Radiography is an essential and low-cost diagnostic method in pulmonary medicine that is used for the early detection and monitoring of lung diseases. An adequate and consistent image quality (IQ) is crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective patient management. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'s remote and automated quality control (QC) methodology, which has been tested in multiple imaging centers. Methods: The data, collected between April and December 2022, included 47 longitudinal data sets from 22 digital radiographic units. Participants submitted metadata on the radiography setup, exposure parameters, and imaging modes. The database comprised 968 exposures, each representing multiple image quality parameters and metadata of image acquisition parameters. Python scripts were developed to collate, analyze, and visualize image quality data. Results: The pilot survey identified several critical issues affecting the future implementation of the IAEA method, as follows: (1) difficulty in accessing raw images due to manufacturer restrictions, (2) variability in IQ parameters even among identical X-ray systems and image acquisitions, (3) inconsistencies in phantom construction affecting IQ values, (4) vendor-dependent DICOM tag reporting, and (5) large variability in SNR values compared to other IQ metrics, making SNR less reliable for image quality assessment. Conclusions: Cross-comparisons among radiography systems must be taken with cautious because of the dependence on phantom construction and acquisition mode variations. Awareness of these factors will generate reliable and standardized quality control programs, which are crucial for accurate and fair evaluations, especially in high-frequency chest imaging.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.