Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  • 2 Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: beatrice.egid@lstmed.ac.uk
  • 3 Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe
  • 4 Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • 5 Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • 6 Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • 7 Department of Global Population Health, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia; Global 50/50, Cambridge, UK
  • 8 BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • 9 School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • 10 Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 11 Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
Lancet, 2026 Oct 31;408(10566):1866-1880.
PMID: 42956773 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01489-3

Abstract

Men occupy a privileged position within gender power relations: the male body has been the default reference point for biomedical research and therapeutic development (with the historical exclusion of women from medical trials), and men dominate health services leadership and exercise well documented medical misogyny. Yet despite their privileged position, many aspects of men's health outcomes are neglected and undertheorised because they are not examined through an intersectional gender lens. Although consideration of gender and masculinity is important for understanding men's health, research thus far has focused predominantly on men's harmful health behaviours, overemphasising individual determinants of health, and a deficit-based approach. Little attention has been paid to the influence of structural determinants of men's health risks and vulnerabilities, or the gender-specific health outcomes of worsening social and economic inequalities. In this first paper of a Lancet Series on men's health, we present a conceptual framework for understanding men's health from an intersectional perspective, highlighting how structural, social, and commercial determinants of health, intersectionality, and syndemic theory can be combined to analyse men's health at different socioecological levels. We illustrate the framework using four selected case studies that show how the health outcomes of marginalised men are influenced by complex interactions. We provide a working definition of men's health that reflects existing literature and builds on the conceptual framework and case studies. Promotion of gender justice and health equity requires moving beyond one-dimensional approaches that construct men as problematic individuals, and towards better understanding and action on the broader set of power systems and structural determinants underpinning men's health.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.