Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • 2 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • 3 School of Business, Monash University, Sunway Campus, Selangor, Malaysia
Data Brief, 2016 Mar;6:378-85.
PMID: 26862585 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.060

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to decision outcomes are reported. Participants engaged in a gambling task (see [1] for details) in which they decided between a risky and a safe option (presented as different coloured shapes) on each trial (416 in total). Each decision was associated with (fully randomised) feedback about the reward outcome (Win/Loss) and its magnitude (varying as a function of decision response; 5-9 points for Risky decisions and 1-4 points for Safe decisions). Here, we show data demonstrating: (a) the influence of Win feedback in the preceding outcome (Outcome t-1) on activity related to the current outcome (Outcome t ); (b) difference wave analysis for outcome expectancy- separating Expected Outcomes (consecutive Loss trials subtracted from consecutive reward) from Unexpected Outcomes (subtracting Loss t-1Win t trials from Win t-1Loss t trials); (c) difference waves separating Switch and Stay responses for Outcome Expectancy; (d) the effect of magnitude induced by decisions (Risk t vs. Safe t ) on Outcome Expectancy; and finally, (e) expectations reflected by response switch direction (Risk to Safe responses vs. Safe to Risk t ) on the FRN at Outcome t .

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.