Affiliations 

  • 1 Sustainability Informatics Group, Sustainable Science Cluster, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran; Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: p.taherei@gmail.com
  • 3 Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • 4 Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 5 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Semnan Brach, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
  • 6 Earth Observation Center, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • 7 Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
J Environ Manage, 2016 Jan 15;166:109-15.
PMID: 26496840 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028

Abstract

Selecting a suitable Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method is a crucial stage to establish a Solid Waste Management (SWM) system. Main objective of the current study is to demonstrate and evaluate a proposed method using Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods (MCDM). An improved version of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) applied to obtain the best municipal solid waste management method by comparing and ranking the scenarios. Applying this method in order to rank treatment methods is introduced as one contribution of the study. Besides, Viekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) compromise solution method applied for sensitivity analyses. The proposed method can assist urban decision makers in prioritizing and selecting an optimized Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) treatment system. Besides, a logical and systematic scientific method was proposed to guide an appropriate decision-making. A modified TOPSIS methodology as a superior to existing methods for first time was applied for MSW problems. Applying this method in order to rank treatment methods is introduced as one contribution of the study. Next, 11 scenarios of MSW treatment methods are defined and compared environmentally and economically based on the waste management conditions. Results show that integrating a sanitary landfill (18.1%), RDF (3.1%), composting (2%), anaerobic digestion (40.4%), and recycling (36.4%) was an optimized model of integrated waste management. An applied decision-making structure provides the opportunity for optimum decision-making. Therefore, the mix of recycling and anaerobic digestion and a sanitary landfill with Electricity Production (EP) are the preferred options for MSW management.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.