Affiliations 

  • 1 Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia. benedikt.ley@menzies.edu.au
  • 2 Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia
  • 3 Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • 4 Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
  • 5 Ministry of Health, National Center for Parasitology Entomology and Malaria Control (CNM), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  • 6 National Key Laboratory ON Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, China
  • 7 Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Malar J, 2017 08 10;16(1):329.
PMID: 28797255 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1981-y

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primaquine is essential for the radical cure of vivax malaria, however its broad application is hindered by the risk of drug-induced haemolysis in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Rapid diagnostic tests capable of diagnosing G6PD deficiency are now available, but these are not used widely.

METHODS: A series of qualitative interviews were conducted with policy makers and healthcare providers in four vivax-endemic countries. Routine G6PD testing is not part of current policy in Bangladesh, Cambodia or China, but it is in Malaysia. The interviews were analysed with regard to respondents perceptions of vivax malaria, -primaquine based treatment for malaria and the complexities of G6PD deficiency.

RESULTS: Three barriers to the roll-out of routine G6PD testing were identified in all sites: (a) a perceived low risk of drug-induced haemolysis; (b) the perception that vivax malaria was benign and accordingly treatment with primaquine was not regarded as a priority; and, (c) the additional costs of introducing routine testing. In Malaysia, respondents considered the current test and treat algorithm suitable and the need for an alternative approach was only considered relevant in highly mobile and hard to reach populations.

CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts are needed to increase awareness of the benefits of the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax and this should be supported by economic analyses exploring the cost effectiveness of routine G6PD testing.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.