Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Health Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • 3 Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
  • 4 Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. heather.mckay@ubc.ca
Arch Osteoporos, 2018 Mar 20;13(1):31.
PMID: 29556801 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0441-9

Abstract

Physical activity is essential for optimal bone strength accrual, but we know little about interactions between physical activity, sedentary time, and bone outcomes in older adolescents. Physical activity (by accelerometer and self-report) positively predicted bone strength and the distal and midshaft tibia in 15-year-old boys and girls. Lean body mass mediated the relationship between physical activity and bone strength in adolescents.

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of physical activity (PA) and sedentary time on bone strength, structure, and density in older adolescents.

METHODS: We used peripheral quantitative computed tomography to estimate bone strength at the distal tibia (8% site; bone strength index, BSI) and tibial midshaft (50% site; polar strength strain index, SSIp) in adolescent boys (n = 86; 15.3 ± 0.4 years) and girls (n = 106; 15.3 ± 0.4 years). Using accelerometers (GT1M, Actigraph), we measured moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPAAccel), vigorous PA (VPAAccel), and sedentary time in addition to self-reported MVPA (MVPAPAQ-A) and impact PA (ImpactPAPAQ-A). We examined relations between PA and sedentary time and bone outcomes, adjusting for ethnicity, maturity, tibial length, and total body lean mass.

RESULTS: At the distal tibia, MVPAAccel and VPAAccel positively predicted BSI (explained 6-7% of the variance, p 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.