Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; Institute of Veterinary Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4412, New Zealand. Electronic address: s.s.syed-hussain@massey.ac.nz
  • 2 Institute of Veterinary Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4412, New Zealand
  • 3 Institute of Veterinary Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4412, New Zealand. Electronic address: W.Pomroy@massey.ac.nz
  • 4 Gribbles Veterinary Pathology, PO Box 12049, Penrose, Auckland 1642, New Zealand
Vet Parasitol, 2015 Jun 15;210(3-4):141-4.
PMID: 25935293 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.03.019

Abstract

To determine if toltrazuril was effective in eliminating Neospora caninum infection from congenitally infected lambs. Twenty-eight ewes were allocated to 3 groups where animals in Groups A and B were inoculated with 1 × 10(7)N. caninum tachyzoites on Day 120 of gestation and Group C was maintained as a negative control group. Lambs born from ewes in Group A were treated with toltrazuril (20mg/kg) on Days 0, 7, 14 and 21 after birth. Lambs in Groups B and C were untreated. All lambs in Groups A and B were seropositive at 12 weeks of age. At 12 weeks of age, no differences between lambs in Group A and Group B were observed in serological results (ELISA and western blot), presence of N. caninum-related brain histopathological lesions or the number of organisms detected by qPCR. Group C remained negative for serology, detection of N. caninum DNA as well as histopathology throughout the study. Results indicate that N. caninum congenitally-infected lambs had a continuing infection with N. caninum despite being treated with toltrazuril.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.