Affiliations 

  • 1 Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America
  • 2 Carlos Slim Health Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 3 Pedro Kourí Tropical Medicine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • 4 Dengue Vaccine Initiative, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
  • 5 University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America
  • 6 Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia
  • 7 Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States of America
  • 8 Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2014 Nov;8(11):e3306.
PMID: 25412506 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003306

Abstract

Dengue presents a formidable and growing global economic and disease burden, with around half the world's population estimated to be at risk of infection. There is wide variation and substantial uncertainty in current estimates of dengue disease burden and, consequently, on economic burden estimates. Dengue disease varies across time, geography and persons affected. Variations in the transmission of four different viruses and interactions among vector density and host's immune status, age, pre-existing medical conditions, all contribute to the disease's complexity. This systematic review aims to identify and examine estimates of dengue disease burden and costs, discuss major sources of uncertainty, and suggest next steps to improve estimates. Economic analysis of dengue is mainly concerned with costs of illness, particularly in estimating total episodes of symptomatic dengue. However, national dengue disease reporting systems show a great diversity in design and implementation, hindering accurate global estimates of dengue episodes and country comparisons. A combination of immediate, short-, and long-term strategies could substantially improve estimates of disease and, consequently, of economic burden of dengue. Suggestions for immediate implementation include refining analysis of currently available data to adjust reported episodes and expanding data collection in empirical studies, such as documenting the number of ambulatory visits before and after hospitalization and including breakdowns by age. Short-term recommendations include merging multiple data sources, such as cohort and surveillance data to evaluate the accuracy of reporting rates (by health sector, treatment, severity, etc.), and using covariates to extrapolate dengue incidence to locations with no or limited reporting. Long-term efforts aim at strengthening capacity to document dengue transmission using serological methods to systematically analyze and relate to epidemiologic data. As promising tools for diagnosis, vaccination, vector control, and treatment are being developed, these recommended steps should improve objective, systematic measures of dengue burden to strengthen health policy decisions.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.