Introduction:Light’s criteria for pleural fluid analysis has long been the standard for distinguishing transudates from exudates. In pleural tuberculosis, the resulting pleural fluids are usually exudates. We present a case of presumed transudative effusion which was eventually diagnosed as pleural tuberculosis. Case description: A 59-year-old man with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) on regular haemodialysis presented with a one-day history of acute onset dys-pnoea associated with pleuritic chest pain and cough. Chest radiograph revealed bilateral pleural effusions and thoracentesis was done. The pleural fluid result was interpreted as transudative effusion according to Light’s criteria because his pleural fluid to serum protein ratio was less than 0.5. AFB 1+ was seen in the pleural fluid with negative gram stain and culture. This resulted in conflicting opinions on whether to start this patient on anti-tuberculous ther-apy (ATT) and there was even a suggestion to get a second opinion for the possibility of AFB fluid contamination. The initial diagnosis was written as fluid overload secondary to ESRF but ATT was started anyway to cover for pleural TB. On further analysis of his pleural fluid, the pleural protein 32 g/L which on its own is a marker of exudative effusion. Subsequent investigations revealed the presence of exudative ascitic fluid which further raised the suspicion for a concomitant peritoneal TB. Conclusion: Premature conclusion that the pleural fluid was transudative occurred prob-ably due to the bilateral nature of the pleural effusion associated with a known tendency for the patient to develop pulmonary overload secondary to his ESRF. This case is a reminder that Light’s criteria also requires serum and fluid LDH measurement for the diagnosis of transudative pleural effusion. More importantly, a high level of suspicion for TB is important when evaluating patients from areas where TB is prevalent and a positive AFB result should not be taken lightly.