Affiliations 

  • 1 Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
  • 2 Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Nottingham (Malaysia Campus), Semenyih, Selangor43500, Malaysia
  • 3 School of The Built Environment and Architecture, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom
  • 4 Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor43600, Malaysia
  • 5 School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH United Kingdom
  • 6 Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7PE, United Kingdom
  • 7 Faculty of Economics, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
  • 8 Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
  • 9 Department of Management, Birkbeck University of London, London WC1E 7JL United Kingdom
  • 10 Sheffield University Management School (SUMS), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 1FL, United Kingdom
Resour Conserv Recycl, 2021 Jan;164:105169.
PMID: 32982059 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169

Abstract

The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on the 11th of March 2020, but the world is still reeling from its aftermath. Originating from China, cases quickly spread across the globe, prompting the implementation of stringent measures by world governments in efforts to isolate cases and limit the transmission rate of the virus. These measures have however shattered the core sustaining pillars of the modern world economies as global trade and cooperation succumbed to nationalist focus and competition for scarce supplies. Against this backdrop, this paper presents a critical review of the catalogue of negative and positive impacts of the pandemic and proffers perspectives on how it can be leveraged to steer towards a better, more resilient low-carbon economy. The paper diagnosed the danger of relying on pandemic-driven benefits to achieving sustainable development goals and emphasizes a need for a decisive, fundamental structural change to the dynamics of how we live. It argues for a rethink of the present global economic growth model, shaped by a linear economy system and sustained by profiteering and energy-gulping manufacturing processes, in favour of a more sustainable model recalibrated on circular economy (CE) framework. Building on evidence in support of CE as a vehicle for balancing the complex equation of accomplishing profit with minimal environmental harms, the paper outlines concrete sector-specific recommendations on CE-related solutions as a catalyst for the global economic growth and development in a resilient post-COVID-19 world.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.