Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute of High Voltage and High Current, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • 2 Institute of High Voltage and High Current, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Malaysia. zulkurnain@utm.my
  • 3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran
  • 4 Science and Research, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • 5 Aerospace Research Institute, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran
  • 6 Golestan Technical and Vocational Training Center, Gorgan, Iran
  • 7 Department of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Khalkhal Branch, Khalkhal, Iran
Sci Rep, 2021 Feb 01;11(1):2728.
PMID: 33526829 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82440-9

Abstract

In this paper, the optimal allocation of constant and switchable capacitors is presented simultaneously in two operation modes, grid-connected and islanded, for a microgrid. Different load levels are considered by employing non-dispatchable distributed generations. The objective function includes minimising the energy losses cost, the cost of peak power losses, and the cost of the capacitor. The optimization problem is solved using the spotted hyena optimizer (SHO) algorithm to determine the optimal size and location of capacitors, considering different loading levels and the two operation modes. In this study, a three-level load and various types of loads, including constant power, constant current, and constant impedance are considered. The proposed method is implemented on a 24-bus radial distribution network. To evaluate the performance of the SHO, the results are compared with GWO and the genetic algorithm (GA). The simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the SHO in reducing the cost of losses and improving the voltage profile during injection and non-injection of reactive power by distributed generations in two operation modes. The total cost and net saving values for DGs only with the capability of active power injection is achieved 105,780 $ and 100,560.54 $, respectively and for DGs with the capability of active and reactive power injection is obtained 89,568 $ and 76,850.46 $, respectively using the SHO. The proposed method has achieved more annual net savings due to the lower cost of losses than other optimization methods.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.