DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized trial.
SETTING: Naturalistic driving in Malaysia.
PARTICIPANTS: Heavy vehicle drivers in Malaysia were assigned to the Device (n = 25) or Control condition (n = 34).
INTERVENTION: Both conditions were monitored for driving events at work over 4-weeks in Phase 1, and 12-weeks in Phase 2. In Phase 1, the Device condition wore the device operated in the silent mode (i.e., no drowsiness alerts) to examine the accuracy of the device in predicting driving events. In Phase 2, the Device condition wore the device in the active mode to examine if drowsiness alerts from the device influenced the rate of driving events (compared to Phase 1).
MEASUREMENTS: All participants were monitored for harsh braking and harsh acceleration driving events and self-reported sleep duration and sleepiness daily.
RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the rate of harsh braking events (Rate ratio = 0.48, p
DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Behavioral and EEG data were acquired from dental surgery trainees with 1 year (n=25) and 4 years of experience (n=20) while they performed low and high difficulty drilling tasks on a virtual reality surgical simulator. EEG power in the 4-7 Hz range in frontal electrodes (indexing frontal theta) was examined as a function of experience, task difficulty and error rate.
RESULTS: Frontal theta power was greater for novices relative to experts (p=0.001), but did not vary according to task difficulty (p=0.15) and there was no Experience × Difficulty interaction (p=0.87). Brain-behavior correlations revealed a significant negative relationship between frontal theta and error in the experienced group for the difficult task (r=-0.594, p=0.0058), but no such relationship emerged for novices.
CONCLUSION: We find frontal theta power differentiates between surgical experiences but correlates only with error rates for experienced surgeons while performing difficult tasks. These results provide a novel perspective on the relationship between expertise and surgical performance.