MyMedR

Displaying publications 1 - 20 of 26 in total

Abstract:

Sort:

Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Thanapal MR, Tata MD, Tan AJ, Subramaniam T, Tong JM, Palayan K, et al.

ANZ J Surg, 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):47-51.
PMID: 23057502 DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06210.x

Although laparoscopic surgeries are associated with reduced surgical stress response and shortened post-operative recovery, intense pain and high analgesia requirements in the immediate post-operative period are often the chief complaints.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage; Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives
A reappraisal of thyroid surgery under local anaesthesia: back to the future?

Hisham AN, Aina EN

ANZ J Surg, 2002 Apr;72(4):287-9.
PMID: 11982518 DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02372.x

BACKGROUND: Thyroid surgery is usually performed under general anaesthesia. However, for a selected group of patients, local anaesthesia may be preferable. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experiences with local anaesthesia with regard to the safety and outcome of this approach.
METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients who underwent primary thyroid surgery were accrued prospectively into this study from May to December 1999. A field block with 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline in 1:200 000 dilutions was given in all cases. In addition, light sedative and narcotics were given as necessary to achieve patient comfort and cooperation. The pain experienced during surgery was recorded using a visual analogue scoring system on a scale of 1-10.
RESULTS: Unilateral thyroid resection was performed in 58 patients, isthmectomy in four patients and bilateral thyroid resection in three patients, two of which were in their second trimester of pregnancy diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer. There were 55 women and 10 men with an average age of 38.2 years (range: 18-67 years). No conversion to general anaesthetic was needed, and the mean operating time was 80 min. The postoperative recovery was quick with this technique and, of interest, 22 (33.9%) patients were discharged within 6 h following the surgery. Overall 62 (95.4%) patients were discharged in the first 24 h and three (4.6%) patients after 24 h. There were no significant postoperative complications encountered except for wound infection in two (3.1%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid surgery under local anaesthesia can be performed safely in a selected group of patients. It offers an effective alternative approach to general anaesthesia and is associated with low morbidity and high levels of patient satisfaction.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine*
Fulltext Alcohol neurolysis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for recurrent meralgia paresthetica

Chen CK, Phui VE, Saman MA

Agri, 2012;24(1):42-4.
PMID: 22399128 DOI: 10.5505/agri.2012.47450

Meralgia paresthetica is an entrapment mononeuropathy of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, which results in localized area of paresthesia and numbness on the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. We describe the use of alcohol neurolysis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in a 74-year-old female who presented with paresthesia over antero-lateral aspect of her left thigh, which was consistent with meralgia paresthetica. Diagnostic block with local anaesthetic confirmed the diagnosis but only archieved temporary pain relief. Alcohol neurolysis was then offered and patient responded well with no complication. The patient experienced prolonged pain relief at 6-month follow-up, with return of ability to ambulate and perform daily activity. Alcohol neurolysis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is safe, effective and able to provide sustained pain relief for recurrent meralgia paresthetica.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage
Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain relief

Delilkan AE, Vijayan R

Anaesthesia, 1993 Apr;48(4):328-31.
PMID: 8494137

The efficacy of epidurally administered tramadol hydrochloride, a weak centrally acting analgesic, was studied for the relief of postoperative pain. Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to three treatment groups to be given the following agents by the epidural route: group 1 tramadol 50 mg; group 2 tramadol 100 mg; group 3 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. The drugs were administered at the patients' request with each patient being allowed four doses in the first 24 h following surgery. Blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, arterial blood gas analyses, pain scores, the interval between doses and the occurrence of any side effects were recorded. Pain scores (assessed using a visual analogue scale) were significantly less (p < 0.05) at 3, 12, and 24 h in patients receiving tramadol 100 mg than in those receiving tramadol 50 mg or bupivacaine. The mean interval between doses for groups 1, 2 and 3 was 7.40 h, 9.36 h and 5.98 h respectively. The mean interval in group 2 was significantly longer than in group 3 (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in group 2 was significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.05).

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Anesthetic management of a parturient with superior vena cava obstruction for cesarean section

Chan YK, Ng KP, Chiu CL, Rajan G, Tan KC, Lim YC

Anesthesiology, 2001 Jan;94(1):167-9.
PMID: 11135739
Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine*
Loss of consciousness following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Chan YK, Gopinathan R, Rajendram R

Br J Anaesth, 2000 Sep;85(3):474-6.
PMID: 11103195

A healthy parturient under spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section lost consciousness for an hour, 20 min after the intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine. The patient was haemodynamically stable before losing consciousness. The differential diagnosis is discussed.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/adverse effects*
Pain control after thoracotomy. An extrapleural tunnel to provide a continuous bupivacaine infusion for intercostal nerve blockade

Majid AA, Hamzah H

Chest, 1992 Apr;101(4):981-4.
PMID: 1555472

This study was undertaken to determine whether an infusion of local anesthetic (LA) delivered through an extrapleural tunnel could provide satisfactory control of pain in the postthoracotomy period. Twelve patients undergoing thoracotomy were studied. A T-shaped tunnel was created by elevating the parietal pleura at the posteromedial end of the thoracotomy wound. An irrigation catheter was then inserted and an infusion of bupivacaine commenced, initially at 5 mg/kg/24 h and subsequently at 3 mg/kg/24 h. Pain was well controlled in eight patients and satisfactory in four patients. The latter required one dose of opiate analgesia each in the 48-h postoperative period. We conclude that an infusion of bupivacaine into the extrapleural space is an effective means of control of pain after thoracotomy.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage*
Fulltext A randomized controlled study comparing subcutaneous pethidine with oral diclofenac for pain relief pain relief after caesarean section

Marzida, M.

JUMMEC, 2009;12(2):63-69.
MyJurnal

It is important to provide effective postoperative analgesia following a Caesarean section because mothers wish to be pain-free, mobile and alert while caring for their babies. The role of regular oral diclofenac as postoperative analgesia was evaluated in a randomized controlled study and it was compared to the established method of parenteral pethidine. Forty healthy women scheduled for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 2-2.5 mg of heavy bupivacaine 0.5% were randomized to receive either 75 mg of oral diclofenac twice daily or 1 mg/kg of subcutaneous pethidine every 8 hourly. Efficacy of pain relief (visual analogue score), patients' satisfaction and side effects such as sedation, nausea and vomiting were recorded for three days. The demographic variables were similar in both groups. Pain relief was adequate and comparable in both groups with similar mean visual analogue score during the second and third day of the study period. However, on the first postoperative day, 60% of the diclofenac group population required rescuemedication consisting of subcutaneous pethidine in order to achieve the same pain scores as those in the pethidine group who did not require any rescue medications. Women who received oral diclofenac reported lower sedation and higher overall satisfaction. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups. This concluded that although oral diclofenac 75mg twice daily may not be superior to the traditional method of subcutaneous pethidine for pain relief following caesarean section, it can still be used alone as an alternative, as it has other benefits of a non-opioid analgesia.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Fulltext Superior somatic pain relief and improved visceral pain control is achieved using pre-emptive analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Koh, P.S., Cha, K.H., Lucy, C., Rampal, S., Yoong, B.K.

JUMMEC, 2012;15(2):1-7.
MyJurnal

BACKGROUND:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although is less invasive than open surgery, is not completely pain free. The use of local anaesthesia to relieve pain following this procedure is a common practice. However, it remains debatable whether a pre- or post-operative drug administration is more effective. Here, we investigated the role of preemptive local anaesthetic infiltration given pre- or post-incisional, in relieving the pain during laparoscopic surgery.

METHODOLOGY:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 96 patients receiving 0.5% Bupivacaine 100mg. Group A (n=48) received post-incisional skin infiltration whilst Group B (n=48) received pre-incisional infiltration. Incisional (somatic) and intra-abdominal (visceral) pain was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at day 0, day 1 and day 7 post-operative days.

RESULT:
Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar. Incisional pain was lower in Group B as compared to Group A at day 0 (P=0.03) and day 1 (P0.05).

CONCLUSION:
Administration of pre-incisional local anaesthesia offers better pre-emptive pain relief measure than post-incisional administration by reducing somatic and visceral pain in laparoscopic gall bladder surgery.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Fulltext Spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine versus combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia using Bupivacaine and Epidural infusion of bupivacaine plus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after hip and knee arthroplasty

Mohd Azizan, G., Karis, M., Noordin, Y.

Journal of Surgical Academia, 2013;3(2):46-53.
MyJurnal

This randomised single-blinded study was conducted to evaluate if there was any difference between spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and intrathecal morphine 0.2mg and combined-spinal epidural using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2.0μg/ml for 24 hours, postoperative analgesia following hip and knee arthroplasty, in terms of pain score and side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression). Eighty patients ASA I or ASA II, aged between 18 to 75 years who underwent knee and hip arthroplasty of approximately 3-4 hours, duration were recruited. They were randomly allocated to one of two groups by using computer generated randomised numbers. The pain score during the postoperative period was evaluated using Visual Analogue Score (VAS pain score) and the side effects were documented and treated accordingly. Results showed that patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were comparable in terms of age, gender, height, weight and race. There was no statistical difference in VAS pain score between the two groups at all times intervals. However, patients in Group 1 had a higher incidence of nausea and pruritus than patients in Group 2. None of the patients in either group, experienced respiratory depression. Thus, it was concluded that both intrathecal morphine 0.2mg and epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2.0μg/ml were comparable in providing postoperative analgesia up to 24 hours following hip and knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, the use of spinal morphine led to a higher incidence of side effects namely nausea and pruritus.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Fulltext Comparison between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and continuous epidural infusion for pain relief after gynaecological surgery

Suhaila, N., Nurlia, Y., Azmil Farid, Z., Melvin, K., Muhammad, M., Nadia, M.N.

Journal of Surgical Academia, 2013;3(2):14-19.
MyJurnal

This prospective, randomised study compared the effectiveness of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in providing pain relief post gynaecological surgery. Sixty six ASA I or II patients planned for gynaecological surgery via Pfannensteil incision under combined spinal epidural anaesthesia were recruited. They were randomised into two groups: Group A patients received PCEA while Group B patients received CEI. In the recovery area, both groups received an epidural combination of levobupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl 2 μg/ml. Group A patients were allowed demand bolus doses of 5 ml with a 20 minute lockout interval, while Group B patients had their epidural infusion initiated at 6 ml/hour with increments as required to a maximum of 12 ml/hour. Pain score and degree of motor blockade was assessed hourly in the first four hours and subsequently at four hourly intervals. Side effects were recorded at four-hourly interval. The total amount of analgesia, number of anaesthetic interventions and patient satisfaction was assessed 24 hours, postoperatively. There was no significant difference in pain score, total amount of analgesia, number of anaesthetic interventions and patient satisfaction. The degree of motor blockade and side effects were comparable between the groups. In conclusion, PCEA was comparable to CEI for pain relief after gynaecological surgery.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Levobupivacaine vs racemic bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Chen CK, Lau FC, Lee WG, Phui VE

J Clin Anesth, 2016 Sep;33:75-80.
PMID: 27555137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.007

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the anesthetic potency and safety of spinal anesthesia with higher dosages of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in patients for bilateral sequential for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Operation theater with postoperative inpatient follow-up.
PATIENTS: The medical records of 315 patients who underwent sequential bilateral TKA were reviewed.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients who received intrathecal levobupicavaine 0.5% were compared with patients who received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 25 μg for spinal anesthesia.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the use of rescue analgesia (systemic opioids, conversion to general anesthesia) during surgery for both groups. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects of local anesthetics (hypotension and bradycardia) during surgery and morbidity related to spinal anesthesia (postoperative nausea, vomiting, and bleeding) during hospital stay.
MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients who received intrathecal levobupivacaine 0.5% (group L) were compared with 90 patients given hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 25 μg (group B). The mean volume of levobupivacaine administered was 5.8 mL (range, 5.0-6.0 mL), and that of bupivacaine was 3.8 mL (range, 3.5-4.0 mL). Both groups achieved similar maximal sensory level of block (T6). The time to maximal height of sensory block was significantly shorter in group B than group L, 18.2 ± 4.5 vs 23.9 ± 3.8 minutes (P< .001). The time to motor block of Bromage 3 was also shorter in group B (8.7 ± 4.1 minutes) than group L (16.0 ± 4.5 minutes) (P< .001). Patients in group B required more anesthetic supplement than group L (P< .001). Hypotension and postoperative bleeding were significantly less common in group L than group B.
CONCLUSION: Levobupivacaine at a higher dosage provided longer duration of spinal anesthesia with better safety profile in sequential bilateral TKA.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage*; Bupivacaine/adverse effects; Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives*
Levobupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in orthopaedic surgery

Afaf AA, Liu CY, Joanna OS

Clin Ter, 2013;164(2):91-5.
PMID: 23698199 DOI: 10.7417/CT.2013.1524

Levobupivacaine is the S(-)enantiomer of bupivacaine, a long acting amino-ester local anaesthetic agent. Cocktail mixture of levobupivacaine and fentanyl infusion is commonly given via epidural for post-operative analgesia. The concentration of levobupivacaine for optimal pain relief with least side effects remained uncertain.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage; Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives*
The effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 miroc g/ml or levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml as a method of postoperative analgesia after major orthopaedic surgery

Misiran KB, Yahaya LS

Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2013 Feb;22(1):59-64.
PMID: 23833852

This prospective randomized single-blinded study was conducted to determine whether there were differences in consumption, demand dosing and postoperative analgesia quality between PCEA using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Seventy patients with ASA classification I and II aged 18 to 80 years old scheduled for elective total knee replacement or total hip replacement were studied. All patients received CSE and then were randomly allocated to receive either ropivacaine 0.165% (Group A) or levobupivacaine 0.125% (Group B) both added with fentanyl 2.0 mcro g/ml via epidural route. PCEA regime was offered for 48 hours with additional standard orthopaedic practice of oral analgesia (etoricoxib 120 mg OD and paracetamol 1.0 gm QID) on the second postoperative day. Basal infusion of PCEA was at 3.0 ml/hour and discontinued after 24 hours following started of PCEA. The consumption of local anaesthetics used within the first 24 hours (basal + demand) and 48 hours (total basal + total demand) were recorded. The VAS pain score, sedation score, side effects and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate) were also recorded every four hours for 48 hours. This study showed that the total volume of drug used was significantly higher in Group A (163.31+/- 29.01 ml) than Group B (142.69 +/- 30.93ml) (p<0. 01). The mean dose of Group A for the first 48 hours after surgery was 251.43 +/- 70.02mg and was significantly greater than the mean dose of Group B (178.91 +/-42.33 mg) (p<0.01). The numbers of PCEA boluses delivered (D) and PCEA attempts (A) were higher in the Group A (22.37 +/-7.32 and 27.66 +/- 9.12) in contrast to Group B (17.63 +/- 7.71 and 24.40 +/- 11.51) but the differences were not statistically significant. The ratio D/A showed significantly higher in Group A (0.83 +/- 0.13) than Group B (0.74 +/- 0.15) (p<0. 02). The VAS pain score was similar for both groups. One patient in Group B had vomiting and there was no sedation, hypotension, pruritus or motor block recorded in both groups. In conclusion this study showed that both PCEA using ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml and levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml provided effective postoperative analgesia within the first 48 hours of major lower limb orthopaedic surgery despite clinically significant dose difference. There was no hypotension, pruritus, sedation or motor block recorded in both groups.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage; Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives
Near fatal error in management of postoperative epidural analgesia

Wan Mat WR, Yahya N, Izaham A, Abdul Rahman R, Abdul Manap N, Md Zain J

Int J Risk Saf Med, 2014;26(2):57-60.
PMID: 24902502 DOI: 10.3233/JRS-140611

Acute pain service (APS) ensures provision of effective and safe postoperative pain relief. The following cases describe a potentially fatal error in managing patients who receive epidural analgesia postoperatively.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives
Fulltext Comparison of Single-Shot Intrathecal Morphine Injection and Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Analgaesia after Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy

Hassan WMNW, Nayan AM, Hassan AA, Zaini RHM

Malays J Med Sci, 2017 Dec;24(6):21-28.
PMID: 29379383 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.6.3

Background: Abdominal hysterectomy (AH) is painful. The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal morphine (ITM) and epidural bupivacaine (EB) for their analgaesia effectiveness after this surgery.
Methods: Thirty-two patients undergoing elective AH were randomised into Group ITM (ITM 0.2 mg + 2.5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine) (n = 16) and Group EB (0.25% bupivacaine bolus + continuous infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine-fentanyl 2 μg/mL) (n = 16).The procedure was performed before induction, and all patients subsequently received standard general anaesthesia. Both groups were provided patient-controlled analgaesia morphine (PCAM) as a backup. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, total morphine consumption, hospital stay duration, early mobilisation time and first PCAM demand time were recorded.
Results: The median VAS score was lower for ITM than for EB after the 1st hour [1.0 (IqR 1.0) versus 3.0 (IqR 3.0), P < 0.001], 8th hour [1.0 (IqR 1.0) versus 2.0 (IqR 1.0), P = 0.018] and 16th hour [1.0 (IqR1.0) versus (1.0 (IqR 1.0), P = 0.006]. The mean VAS score at the 4th hour was also lower for ITM [1.8 (SD 1.2) versus 2.9 (SD 1.4), P = 0.027]. Total morphine consumption [11.3 (SD 6.6) versus 16.5 (SD 4.8) mg, P = 0.016] and early mobilisation time [2.1 (SD 0.3) versus 2.6 (SD 0.9) days, P = 0.025] were also less for ITM. No significant differences were noted for other assessments.
Conclusions: The VAS score was better for ITM than for EB at earlier hours after surgery. However, in terms of acceptable analgaesia (VAS ≤ 3), both techniques were comparable over 24 hours.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine
Fulltext Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Mageswaran R, Choy YC

Med J Malaysia, 2010 Dec;65(4):300-3.
PMID: 21901950

A prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted which involved, 60 ASA 1-2, aged 18-65 years patients, who had elective or emergency orthopaedic surgeries of the upper limbs. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group I received 30 mls of 0.5% ropivacaine; and Group II received 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block based on the coracoid approach. The onset time required for sensory block of all required dermatomes (C5-T1) and the onset time of motor block were documented. Based on the Visual Analogue Score, pain scores were recorded every 30 minutes during surgery and at the 6th hour. The mean onset time (SD) for sensory block with ropivacaine was 13.5 +/- 2.9 minutes compared to levobupivacaine at 11.1 +/- 2.6 minutes (p = 0.003). The onset time for motor block was 19.0 +/- 2.7 minutes in Group I compared to 17.1 +/- 2.6 minutes (p = 0.013) in Group II. Patients in both groups experienced both mild to moderate pain at the 6th hour. In conclusion, there were statistically significant differences in the onset-time for sensory and motor block. However, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of effectiveness of analgesia at the 6th hour. Although the clinical advantage of levobupivacine is not substantial, its safety profile becomes a major consideration in the choice of local anaesthetic for brachial plexus block where a large volume is required for an effective result.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives; Bupivacaine/pharmacology
Fulltext Comparison of morphine with fentanyl added to intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for analgesia after caesarean section

Siti Salmah G, Choy YC

Med J Malaysia, 2009 Mar;64(1):71-4.
PMID: 19852327 MyJurnal

This was a prospective randomised, controlled, single-blind study done to determine the effect of intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg as compared with intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg in terms of analgesia and duration for postoperative pain relief after Caesarean section. Sixty ASA I or II parturients were randomised into two groups. Group 1 (n=33) received 1.8 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 0.1 mg morphine while Group 2 (n=27) received 1.8 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 25 microg fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia. Postoperatively, all patients were provided with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. Pain was assessed using visual analogue score (VAS) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours. Time to first demand of PCA morphine, cumulative PCA morphine requirement and opioid side effects were documented. The VAS for pain and the cumulative PCA morphine requirement were both significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.05) during the 24 hours study period. The time to first demand was also significantly longer in Group 1 (p < 0.05). Overall, there were no significant difference between the two groups in side effects, except for a high incidence of nausea and vomiting requiring treatment in Group B in the first six hours. In conclusion the addition of 0.1 mg morphine for spinal anaesthesia provided superior and longer postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage*; Bupivacaine/adverse effects
Fulltext Comparison of intra-articular analgesics for analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery

Rao SK, Rao PS

Med J Malaysia, 2005 Dec;60(5):560-2.
PMID: 16515105

Post Arthroscopic intra-articular analgesia is a better method to avoid post-operative pain after arthroscopic surgery, thus avoiding the adverse effects of systemic analgesics. In this prospective randomized double blind study conducted on 90 patients, 30 patients in group A received 20 ml of intra-articular saline, 30 patients in Group B received 10 ml of intra-articular saline and 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 30 patients in Group C received 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, 1 ml (30 mg) of ketorolac and 9 ml of saline intra-articularly. Ambulatory status, duration of analgesia and requirement for supplemented analgesia were compared in these three groups. Patients receiving this intra-articular analgesic combination of bupivacaine and ketorolac required significantly less supplemental postoperative analgesics. This combination significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia. Patients receiving this combination of drugs for intra-articular analgesia ambulated earlier.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine/administration & dosage*
Fulltext Arthroscopy under local anaesthesia

Ramanathan R

Med J Malaysia, 1998 Sep;53 Suppl A:99-101.
PMID: 10968190

We studied 95 patients who underwent knee Arthroscopy under local anaesthesia between JANUARY 1995 till 1997. Materials used were 1% Xylocaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine of 20 mls each combined with midazolam 2 mg and IV pethidine 30 mgm for sedation. The patients were attached to monitors (pulse Oxymeter, ECG and BP and pulse recorders) and blood less field was created using a tornquet. The procedures lasted about 45 minutes. 90 out of 95 patients completed the procedures successfully without any complications. 2 developed respiratory embarrassments and were intubated and ventilated. 3 procedures abandoned and converted to general anaesthesia. The range of procedures done include meniscectomy, meniscal repair, synovial biopsy, debridement for osteoarthrosis, shaving of osteophytes, drilling of cartilage and bones and removal of loose bodies. This study is to show that knee arthroscopy under LA is a safe alternative in hospitals where GA time is limited.

Matched MeSH terms: Bupivacaine*

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links