METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the cases diagnosed with CVST admitted to our centre from January 2011 until November 2015.
RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were included in this review. The patterns of imaging findings as well as risk factors for CVST is discussed with a review of the literature and current management practices. One year followed-up showed full recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) of 5) in 10 cases (66.7%), whereas 4 cases (26.7%) with GOS of 4 (three cases with neurological deficits, and 1 case with mild symptom. There was one case of mortality in this study secondary to sepsis during hospitalisation. The presenting symptoms were mainly headache, focal neurology deficits, seizure and altered sensorium. Risk factors identified were oral contraceptive pills usage, chronic sinuses or ear infections, and obesity. Initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed various findings and haemorrhagic infarct was one of the common findings. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) revealed majority of the patients had occlusion at two or more venous sinus sites. No patients had new or recurrent intracranial haemorrhage following initiation of anticoagulation therapy.
CONCLUSION: Thus it is considerable safe to start anticoagulation therapy in CVST patients including those with intracranial haemorrhage. We propose further neuroimaging to avoid missed diagnosis of CVST in patient presented with recent onset headache and CT evidence of unusual cerebral infarction.
METHODS: The warfarin maintenance doses for 140 patients were predicted using the dosing tool and compared with the observed maintenance dose. The impact of genotype was assessed by predicting maintenance doses with prior parameter values known to be altered by genetic variability (eg, EC50 for VKORC1 genotype). The prior population was evaluated by fitting the published kinetic-pharmacodynamic model, which underpins the Bayesian tool, to the observed data using NONMEM and comparing the model parameter estimates with published values.
RESULTS: The Bayesian tool produced positively biased dose predictions in the new cohort of patients (mean prediction error [95% confidence interval]; 0.32 mg/d [0.14-0.5]). The bias was only observed in patients requiring ≥7 mg/d. The direction and magnitude of the observed bias was not influenced by genotype. The prior model provided a good fit to our data, which suggests that the bias was not caused by different prior and posterior populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance doses for patients requiring ≥7 mg/d were overpredicted. The bias was not due to the influence of genotype nor was it related to differences between the prior and posterior populations. There is a need for a more mechanistic model that captures warfarin dose-response relationship at higher warfarin doses.
METHODS: An open-label, non-inferiority, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted at three academic hospitals in South East Asia, involving 322 ethnically diverse patients newly indicated for warfarin (NCT00700895). Clinical follow-up was 90 days. The primary efficacy measure was the number of dose titrations within the first 2 weeks of therapy, with a mean non-inferiority margin of 0.5 over the first 14 days of therapy.
RESULTS: Among 322 randomized patients, 269 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Compared with traditional dosing, the genotype-guided group required fewer dose titrations during the first 2 weeks (1.77 vs. 2.93, difference -1.16, 90% CI -1.48 to -0.84, P
METHODS: In this prospective real-world study, we recruited and followed up patients diagnosed with CAT treated with rivaroxaban or standard of care as a control for 12 months or until death. Baseline characteristics were collected at the study entry. The primary outcomes were recurrent DVT or PE and death within 12 months after treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were composite outcomes of major and minor bleeding. Results: A total of 80 patients confirm CAT with radiological imaging were recruited; 39 patients were evaluated in the control arm and 41 patients in the rivaroxaban arm. The 12 months cumulative CAT recurrence rate was 46.2% in control and 39% in rivaroxaban (p=0.519). The 12-month death was not a statistically significant difference between both arms (20.5% vs. 31.7%, p=0.255). The cumulative rate of composite safety outcomes was similar in both groups (17.9% vs. 12.2%, p=0.471).
CONCLUSION: The result of this small but important real-world evidence proofs that rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to the standard of care for CAT in Malaysia's cancer population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five Malay patients receiving warfarin maintenance therapy were investigated for their CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and VKORC1-1639G>A genotypes and their vitamin K-dependent (VKD) clotting factor activities. The records of their daily warfarin doses and international normalized ratio (INR) 2 years prior to and after the measurement of VKD clotting factors activities were acquired. The mean warfarin doses were compared with predicted warfarin doses calculated from a genotypic-based dosing model developed for Asians.
RESULTS: A patient with the VKORC1-1639 GA genotype, who was supposed to have higher dose requirements, had a lower mean warfarin dose similar to those having the VKORC1-1639 AA genotype. This discrepancy may be due to the coadministration of celecoxib, which has the potential to decrease warfarins metabolism. Not all patients' predicted mean warfarin doses based on a previously developed dosing algorithm for Asians were similar to the actual mean warfarin dose, with the worst predicted dose being 54.34% higher than the required warfarin dose.
CONCLUSION: Multiple clinical factors can significantly change the actual required dose from the predicted dose from time to time. The additions of other dynamic variables, especially INR, VKD clotting factors, and concomitant drug use, into the dosing model are important in order to improve its accuracy.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception to Feb 24th, 2017, to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that assessed interventions or strategies to improve oral anticoagulant use in AF patients.
RESULTS: Thirty-four systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion but only 11 were included in the qualitative analyses, corresponding to 40 unique meta-analyses, as the remaining systematic reviews had overlapping primary studies. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics for stroke prevention in AF patients. Conversely, patient's self-management and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), in general were superior to warfarin for preventing stroke and reducing mortality. All interventions showed comparable risk of major bleeding with warfarin.
CONCLUSION: Findings from this overview support the superiority of NOACs and patient's self-management for preventing stroke in AF patients. However, uncertainties remain on the benefits of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics due to poor quality evidence, and future research is warranted.