METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on 140 final-year undergraduate nursing students in three nursing universities in Eswatini. A questionnaire adapted from Othman and Ali in Malaysia with closed-ended questions was modified and used to collect data. The questionnaire consisted of questions on the virus structure, transmission, prevention and management of HIV and AIDS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was utilised to analyse the data.
RESULTS: The level of knowledge about HIV and AIDS was high, as evidenced by a mean score and standard deviation of (91.02 ± 5.00). However, there were low scores on questions related to the transmission of the disease.
CONCLUSION: Across all three universities in Eswatini, there were good nursing education programmes on HIV and AIDS, evidenced by the high knowledge level about HIV and AIDS. However, there are still some knowledge gaps on HIV and AIDS transmission and management that need to be attended to.Contribution: This study contributed by providing knowledge of undergraduate nursing students' HIV and AIDS training and management of PLWHA.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental study two-group pre-test post-test design. A total of 153 eligible senior undergraduate students completed the study (76 in the intervention group and 77 in the control group). They were recruited from two Bachelor of Sciences in Nursing (BSN) cohorts from nursing schools at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), in Iran, in January 2020. Randomization was undertaken at the level of school via a simple lottery method. The intervention group received the professional portfolio learning program as a holistic blended learning modality, though the control group received conventional learning during professional clinical practice. A demographic questionnaire and the Nurse Professional Self-concept questionnaire were used for data collection.
RESULTS: The findings imply the effectiveness of the blended PPL program. Results of Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis was indicated significantly improved professional self-concept development and its dimensions (self-esteem, caring, staff relation, communication, knowledge, leadership) with high effect size. The results of the between-group comparison for professional self-concept and its dimensions at different time points (pre, post and follow up test) showed a significant difference between groups at post-test and follow up test (p 0.05).The results of within-group comparison for both control and intervention showed that there were significant differences in professional self-concept and for all its dimensions across the time from pre-test to post-test and follow-up (p
BACKGROUND: Narrative pedagogy has been developed for over a decade, and while studies confirm that it can stimulate student interest, foster empathy, and enhance the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical skills in nursing care, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend its widespread adoption.
METHODS: In November 2024, a comprehensive search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, OVID, Scopus, PsychInfo, CNKI, Wanfang Data, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) to identify studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted, and the quality of studies was assessed prior to conducting a meta-analysis. The review protocol was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)(CRD42024606820).
RESULTS: Out of an initial pool of 11748 articles, 41 studies were selected for meta-analysis after a rigorous screening process. The results indicate that narrative pedagogy significantly improves nursing students' final examination scores, practical skills, empathy, and professional identity compared with traditional teaching methods.
CONCLUSION: Narrative pedagogy effectively enhances nursing students' final examination performance, practical skills, empathy, and professional identity. However, given the limited number and quality of the included studies, these findings should be confirmed by further high-quality research.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Narrative education has been used in nursing teaching for more than 15 years, but there is no evidence to show the effectiveness of narrative education in nursing students. Therefore, this study aims to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the learning effects of narrative education on nursing students. From the establishment of the database until November 2024, a systematic evaluation search was conducted on 11 databases. After careful screening process, 41 studies on narrative education of urination nursing students in China were selected for meta-analysis. The results show that narrative education is significantly better than traditional teaching methods in improving final exam scores, practical skills, humanistic care ability, empathy and professional identity. Given the limited number and quality of included studies, these findings should be confirmed by further high-quality studies.
METHODS: An adapted four stage AEBCD approach was used. Four co-design workshops were conducted over four months with interdisciplinary health profession students (nursing and pharmacy). An embedded focused ethnography captured social, cultural, and interactional dynamics through observational researcher field notes. Artefacts and post-workshop focus groups informed iterative development and explored participants experiences of co-design. Field notes were analysed using Rapid Qualitative Inquiry (RQI) and focus groups were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: Fifteen pre-registration nursing and pharmacy students participated in the workshops. The co-design process resulted in a four-module gamified e-resource on healthcare decarbonisation. Three overarching themes were identified during post-workshop focus groups were: (1) increasing agency and confidence in action, (2) fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and shared purpose, and (3) the value of structured facilitation and tangible outputs. Students reported enhanced engagement, ownership, and perceived readiness to apply sustainability principles in future professional practice.
CONCLUSION: The AEBCD approach provided a robust and participatory framework for co-designing a learner-centred e-resource on healthcare decarbonisation. The integration of focused ethnography strengthened understanding of how co-design processes shaped engagement and decision-making, ensuring that stakeholder experiences directly informed both content and delivery. This combined methodological approach offers a transferable process for integrating AEBCD with focused ethnography, strengthening the visibility, reflexivity, and reproducibility of co-design in health professions education.
AIM: To reflect on the transcription, analysis, interpretation and translation of data in this cross-cultural study.
DISCUSSION: The findings of this study show how these nurses developed personally and professionally despite challenges, which enabled them to attain a western degree.
CONCLUSION: Some important aspects of cross-cultural research need to be considered when conducting studies and presenting their findings, as cultural values continue to affect society.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The discussion provided will assist novice researchers, nurse research and clinical practice and reviewers of scientific articles when conducting cross-cultural research.