Displaying all 8 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Thalluri C, Amin R, Mandhadi JR, Gacem A, Emran TB, Dey BK, et al.
    Biomed Res Int, 2022;2022:2467574.
    PMID: 36046453 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2467574
    Ondansetron tablets that are directly compressed using crospovidone and croscarmellose as a synthetic super disintegrant are the subject of this investigation. A central composite, response surface, randomly quadratic, nonblock (version 13.0.9.0) 32 factorial design is used to optimize the formulation (two-factor three-level). To make things even more complicated, nine different formulation batches (designated as F1-F9) were created. There were three levels of crospovidone and croscarmellose (+1, 0, -1). In addition to that, pre- and postcompressional parameters were evaluated, and all evaluated parameters were found to be within acceptable range. Among all postcompressional parameter dispersion and disintegration time, in vitro drug release experiments (to quantify the amount of medication released from the tablet) and their percentage prediction error were shown to have a significant influence on three dependent variables. Various pre- and postcompression characteristics of each active component were tested in vitro. Bulk density, tap density, angle of repose, Carr's index, and the Hausner ratio were all included in this analysis, as were many others. This tablet's hardness and friability were also assessed along with its dimension and weight variations. Additional stability studies may be conducted using the best batch of the product. For this study, we utilised the Design-Expert software to select the formulation F6, which had dispersion times of 17.67 ± 0.03 seconds, disintegration times of 120.12 ± 0.55 seconds, and percentage drug release measurements of 99.25 ± 0.36 within 30 minutes. Predicted values and experimental data had a strong correlation. Fast dissolving pills of ondansetron hydrochloride may be created by compressing the tablets directly.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron*
  2. Abas MN, Tan PC, Azmi N, Omar SZ
    Obstet Gynecol, 2014 Jun;123(6):1272-1279.
    PMID: 24807340 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000242
    OBJECTIVE: To compare ondansetron with metoclopramide in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum.

    METHODS: We enrolled 160 women with hyperemesis gravidarum in a double-blind randomized trial. Participants were randomized to intravenous 4 mg ondansetron or 10 mg metoclopramide every 8 hours for 24 hours. Participants kept an emesis diary for 24 hours; at 24 hours, they expressed their well-being using a 10-point visual numeric rating scale and answered an adverse effects questionnaire. Nausea intensity was evaluated using a 10-point visual numeric rating scale at enrollment and at 8, 16, and 24 hours. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.

    RESULTS: Eighty women each were randomized to ondansetron or metoclopramide. Median well-being visual numeric rating scale scores were 9 (range, 5-10) compared with 9 (range, 4-10) (P=.33) and vomiting episodes in the first 24 hours were 1 (range, 0-9) compared with 2 (range, 0-23) (P=.38) for ondansetron compared with metoclopramide, respectively. Repeat-measures analysis of variance of nausea visual numeric rating scale showed no difference between study drugs (P=.22). Reported rates of drowsiness (12.5% compared with 30%; P=.01; number needed to treat to benefit, 6), xerostomia (10.0% compared with 23.8%; Pondansetron. Length of hospital stay was similar.

    CONCLUSION: Ondansetron and metoclopramide demonstrated similar antiemetic and antinauseant effects in hyperemesis gravidarum. However, the overall profile, particularly regarding adverse effects, was better with ondansetron. In our setting, metoclopramide was significantly less expensive than ondansetron and remained a reasonable antiemetic choice.

    CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCN Register, www.isrctn.org, ISRCTN00592566.

    LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/administration & dosage; Ondansetron/adverse effects; Ondansetron/therapeutic use*
  3. Sheshala R, Khan N, Chitneni M, Darwis Y
    Arch Pharm Res, 2011 Nov;34(11):1945-56.
    PMID: 22139694 DOI: 10.1007/s12272-011-1115-y
    The aim of this study was to formulate cost effective taste-masked orally disintegrating tablets of ondansetron, a bitter drug using different superdisintegrants by a wet granulation technique. Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) as a diluent and disintegrant in addition to aspartame as a sweetener were used in all formulations. The prepared tablets were evaluated for weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, drug content, water content, in vitro disintegration time and in vitro drug release. The tablets' hardness was maintained in the range of 2-3 kg and friability was <1% for all batches. All tablet formulations disintegrated rapidly in vitro within 5.83 to 33.0 sec. The optimized formulation containing 15% Polyplasdone XL-10 released more than 90% of drug within 5 min and the release was comparable to that of a commercial product. In human volunteers, optimized formulation was found to have a pleasant taste and mouth feel and they disintegrated in the oral cavity within 12 sec. The stability results were also satisfactory. A pharmacokinetic study with the optimized formulation was performed in comparison with a reference (Zofer MD 8®) and they were found to be bioequivalent. In conclusion, a cost effective ondansetron orally disintegrating tablet was successfully prepared with acceptable hardness, desirable taste and rapid disintegration in the oral cavity.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/analysis; Ondansetron/pharmacokinetics*; Ondansetron/pharmacology; Ondansetron/chemistry*
  4. Lim AKH, Haron MR, Yap TM
    Med J Malaysia, 1994 Sep;49(3):231-8.
    PMID: 7845271
    This trial was carried out in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Fifty-two patients who were scheduled to receive their first or subsequent courses of cancer chemotherapy with single dose cisplatinum containing chemotherapy regimens were evaluated. Thirty-four patients were given ondansetron in one group while 18 in the other group received metoclopramide with dexamethasone. The response to treatment was categorised as complete (0 emetic episode), major (1 or 2 emetic episodes), minor (3 to 5 emetic episodes) or failure (> 5 emetic episodes or rescue medication). Among the 52 patients, a complete or major control (0 to 2 emetic episodes) was achieved in 23/34 patients (68%) from the ondansetron group and in 3/18 patients (17%) from the metoclopramide with dexamethasone group (p < 0.002) on day 1. Similarly, the control of nausea was greater in the ondansetron group compared with the metoclopramide with dexamethasone group (p < 0.0009) on day 1. Two patients were excluded (dropped out) after day one from each of the two study groups due to excessive vomiting subsequent to cisplatinum therapy. From days 2 to 6, there was a trend in favour of ondansetron. Both treatments were well tolerated. The results of this trial show that in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatinum containing chemotherapy, the efficacy of ondansetron is superior to that of a standard anti-emetic combination, metoclopramide with dexamethasone.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/administration & dosage; Ondansetron/therapeutic use*
  5. Tan PC, Omar SZ
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2011 Apr;23(2):87-93.
    PMID: 21297474 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328342d208
    PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) affects 90% of pregnant women and its impact is often underappreciated. Hyperemesis gravidarum, the most severe end of the spectrum, affects 0.5-2% of pregnancies. The pathogenesis of this condition remains obscure and its management has largely been empirical. This review aims to provide an update on advances in pregnancy hyperemesis focusing on papers published within the past 2 years.

    RECENT FINDINGS: The cause of hyperemesis is continuing to be elaborated. Recent data attest to the effectiveness of the oral doxylamine-pyridoxine in NVP. Follow-up data of children exposed in early pregnancy to doxylamine-pyridoxine for NVP are reassuring. Evidence is increasing for ginger as an effective herbal remedy for NVP. Metoclopramide is effective in NVP and hyperemesis gravidarum, with a good balance of efficacy and tolerability. A recent large-scale study on first trimester exposure to metoclopramide is reassuring of its safety. Evidence is emerging for the treatment of acid reflux to ameliorate NVP. The role of corticosteroids for hyperemesis gravidarum remains controversial. Transpyloric feeding may be warranted for persistent weight loss, despite optimal antiemetic therapy.

    SUMMARY: Women with significant NVP should be identified so that they can be safely and effectively treated.

    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/therapeutic use
  6. Abdelaziz DH, Boraii S, Cheema E, Elnaem MH, Omar T, Abdelraouf A, et al.
    Biomed Pharmacother, 2021 Aug;140:111725.
    PMID: 34015580 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111725
    BACKGROUND: Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a major challenge. Ondansetron blocks sodium channels and may have local anesthetic properties.

    AIMS: To investigate the effect of intraperitoneal administration of ondansetron for postoperative pain management as an adjuvant to intravenous acetaminophen in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into two groups (n = 25 each) to receive either intraperitoneal ondansetron or saline injected in the gall bladder bed at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome was the difference in pain from baseline to 24-h post-operative assessed by comparing the area under the curve of visual analog score between the two groups.

    RESULTS: The derived area under response curve of visual analog scores in the ondansetron group (735.8 ± 418.3) was 33.97% lower than (p = 0.005) that calculated for the control group (1114.4 ± 423.9). The need for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the ondansetron (16%) versus in the control group (54.17%) (p = 0.005), indicating better pain control. The correlation between the time for unassisted mobilization and the area under response curve of visual analog scores signified the positive analgesic influence of ondansetron (rs =0.315, p = 0.028). The frequency of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in patients who received ondansetron than that reported in the control group (p = 0.023 (8 h), and 0.016 (24 h) respectively).

    CONCLUSIONS: The added positive impact of ondansetron on postoperative pain control alongside its anti-emetic effect made it a unique novel option for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/therapeutic use*
  7. Sharma S, Abdullah N
    Singapore Med J, 2000 Apr;41(4):147-50.
    PMID: 11063177
    Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving one hundred ASA I-II patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron/administration & dosage*
  8. Zulkifli MH, Viswenaden P, Jasamai M, Azmi N, Yaakob NS
    Biomed Pharmacother, 2019 Feb 20;112:108630.
    PMID: 30797147 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108630
    5-HT3R antagonists such as ondansetron, granisetron and tropisetron have been clinically used to treat nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy patients. However, current study and research revealed novel potentials of these ligands in other diseases like inflammation, Alzheimer's, and drug abuse. Towards utilising these drugs as anti-smoking agents to treat nicotine dependence problem, there are conflicting reports regarding the potential of these ligands in modulating the effects of nicotine in both human and animal behavioural studies. This is complicated by the heterogeneity of 5-HT3R itself, cross regulation between nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptor (nAChR) and distinct pharmacological profiles of 5-HT3R antagonists. This review gathered existing studies conducted investigating the potential of "-setron" class of 5-HT3R antagonists in modulating nicotine effects. We proposed that the mechanism where 5-HT3R antagonists mediate the effects of nicotine could be attributed by both direct at 5-HT3R and indirect mechanism in nicotine addiction downstream regulation. The indirect mechanism mediated by the 5-HT3R antagonist could be through α7 nAChR, 5-HT1B receptor (5-HT1BR), 5-HT1C receptor (5-HT1CR), calcineurin activity, p38 MAPK level, PPAR-γ and NF-κβ. Our review suggested that future studies should focus on newer 5-HT3R antagonist with superior pharmacological profile or the one with multitarget action rather than high selectivity at single receptor.
    Matched MeSH terms: Ondansetron
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links