Affiliations 

  • 1 Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
  • 2 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
  • 3 The Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 4 Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 5 Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 6 Essential Medicine and Technology Division, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan
  • 7 Health Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Health, Quezon City, Philippines
  • 8 Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • 9 China Health Technology Assessment Centre, National Health Development Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
  • 10 Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 11 Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
  • 12 Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • 13 Taiwan National Hepatitis C Program Office, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 14 Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • 15 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
  • 16 Center for Medical Technology Policy (CMTP), Baltimore, MD, USA
  • 17 Cancer Research Program, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
PMID: 37579427 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6858

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, there is increasing interest in the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) to inform health technology assessment (HTA) and reimbursement decision-making. Using current practices and case studies shared by eleven health systems in Asia, a non-binding guidance that seeks to align practices for generating and using RWD/RWE for decision-making in Asia was developed by the REAL World Data In ASia for HEalth Technology Assessment in Reimbursement (REALISE) Working Group, addressing a current gap and needs among HTA users and generators.

METHODS: The guidance document was developed over two face-to-face workshops, in addition to an online survey, a face-to-face interview and pragmatic search of literature. The specific focus was on what, where and how to collect RWD/ RWE.

RESULTS: All 11 REALISE member jurisdictions participated in the online survey and the first in-person workshop, 10 participated in the second in-person workshop, and 8 participated in the in-depth face-to-face interviews. The guidance document was iteratively reviewed by all working group members and the International Advisory Panel. There was substantial variation in: (a) sources and types of RWD being used in HTA, and (b) the relative importance and prioritization of RWE being used for policy-making. A list of national-level databases and other sources of RWD available in each country was compiled. A list of useful guidance on data collection, quality assurance and study design were also compiled.

CONCLUSION: The REALISE guidance document serves to align the collection of better quality RWD and generation of reliable RWE to ultimately inform HTA in Asia.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.