Affiliations 

  • 1 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA. jedediah.brodie@umontana.edu
  • 2 Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 4 Fauna and Flora International-Vietnam Programme, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 5 Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 6 Department of Plant Sciences and Conservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 7 Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 8 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  • 9 Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
  • 10 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
  • 11 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
  • 12 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
  • 13 School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
  • 14 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
  • 15 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 16 The South East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership (SEARRP), Danum Valley Field Centre, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 17 IUCN Species Survival Commission, Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Investigation (IVIC) and Provita, Caracas, Venezuela
  • 18 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
  • 19 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Nature, 2023 Aug;620(7975):807-812.
PMID: 37612395 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06410-z

Abstract

The United Nations recently agreed to major expansions of global protected areas (PAs) to slow biodiversity declines1. However, although reserves often reduce habitat loss, their efficacy at preserving animal diversity and their influence on biodiversity in surrounding unprotected areas remain unclear2-5. Unregulated hunting can empty PAs of large animals6, illegal tree felling can degrade habitat quality7, and parks can simply displace disturbances such as logging and hunting to unprotected areas of the landscape8 (a phenomenon called leakage). Alternatively, well-functioning PAs could enhance animal diversity within reserves as well as in nearby unprotected sites9 (an effect called spillover). Here we test whether PAs across mega-diverse Southeast Asia contribute to vertebrate conservation inside and outside their boundaries. Reserves increased all facets of bird diversity. Large reserves were also associated with substantially enhanced mammal diversity in the adjacent unprotected landscape. Rather than PAs generating leakage that deteriorated ecological conditions elsewhere, our results are consistent with PAs inducing spillover that benefits biodiversity in surrounding areas. These findings support the United Nations goal of achieving 30% PA coverage by 2030 by demonstrating that PAs are associated with higher vertebrate diversity both inside their boundaries and in the broader landscape.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.