Affiliations 

  • 1 New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
  • 2 Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, Schools of Mathematics and Statistics, Biology, and Computer Science, The Observatory Buchanan Gardens University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9LZ, United Kingdom
  • 3 Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża 17-230, Poland
  • 4 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601
  • 5 Swift Ecology Ltd, Glen Cottage, West Malvern, Worcs WR14 4BQ, United Kingdom
  • 6 Fauna and Flora International-Vietnam Programme, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 7 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
  • 8 Fondazione Ethoikos, Convento dell'Osservanza, Radicondoli SI 53030, Italy
  • 9 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
  • 10 Department of Natural Resources, College of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02852
  • 11 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland
  • 12 Scientific Laboratory of Gorce National Park, Niedźwiedź 34-735, Poland
  • 13 Cascades Carnivore Project, Hood River, OR 97031
  • 14 Department of Environmental Conservation, University Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
  • 15 Smithsonian's Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA 22630
  • 16 Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia
  • 17 Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008
  • 18 School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 19 Sarawak Forestry Corporation, Lot 218, Kuching Central Land District, Kuching, Sarawak 93250, Malaysia
  • 20 Deparment of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • 21 Laboratorio de Zoología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C. P. 91190, Mexico
  • 22 Departamento de Biología, Laboratorio de Ecología Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Ciudad de México, Iztapalapa C. P. 09340, Mexico
  • 23 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom
  • 24 School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
  • 25 U.S. Geological Survey, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
  • 26 Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2312252121.
PMID: 38466845 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2312252121

Abstract

The social system of animals involves a complex interplay between physiology, natural history, and the environment. Long relied upon discrete categorizations of "social" and "solitary" inhibit our capacity to understand species and their interactions with the world around them. Here, we use a globally distributed camera trapping dataset to test the drivers of aggregating into groups in a species complex (martens and relatives, family Mustelidae, Order Carnivora) assumed to be obligately solitary. We use a simple quantification, the probability of being detected in a group, that was applied across our globally derived camera trap dataset. Using a series of binomial generalized mixed-effects models applied to a dataset of 16,483 independent detections across 17 countries on four continents we test explicit hypotheses about potential drivers of group formation. We observe a wide range of probabilities of being detected in groups within the solitary model system, with the probability of aggregating in groups varying by more than an order of magnitude. We demonstrate that a species' context-dependent proclivity toward aggregating in groups is underpinned by a range of resource-related factors, primarily the distribution of resources, with increasing patchiness of resources facilitating group formation, as well as interactions between environmental conditions (resource constancy/winter severity) and physiology (energy storage capabilities). The wide variation in propensities to aggregate with conspecifics observed here highlights how continued failure to recognize complexities in the social behaviors of apparently solitary species limits our understanding not only of the individual species but also the causes and consequences of group formation.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.