Affiliations 

  • 1 Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton, 3800 Melbourne, Australia
  • 2 Heart Failure Research Group, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, 3004 Melbourne, Australia
  • 3 Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Disease Research (CCBDR), La Trobe Institute of Medical Science (LIMS), Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
  • 4 Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biodiscovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Cardiovasc Res, 2024 Sep 02;120(10):1155-1163.
PMID: 38518247 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvae062

Abstract

AIMS: Animal models are regularly used to test the role of the gut microbiome in hypertension. Small-scale pre-clinical studies have investigated changes to the gut microbiome in the angiotensin II hypertensive model. However, the gut microbiome is influenced by internal and external experimental factors, which are not regularly considered in the study design. Once these factors are accounted for, it is unclear if microbiome signatures are reproduceable. We aimed to determine the influence of angiotensin II treatment on the gut microbiome using a large and diverse cohort of mice and to quantify the magnitude by which other factors contribute to microbiome variations.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study to establish a diverse mouse cohort resembling large human studies. We sequenced the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from 538 samples across the gastrointestinal tract of 303 male and female C57BL/6J mice randomized into sham or angiotensin II treatment from different genotypes, diets, animal facilities, and age groups. Analysing over 17 million sequencing reads, we observed that angiotensin II treatment influenced α-diversity (P = 0.0137) and β-diversity (i.e. composition of the microbiome, P < 0.001). Bacterial abundance analysis revealed patterns consistent with a reduction in short-chain fatty acid producers, microbial metabolites that lower blood pressure. Furthermore, animal facility, genotype, diet, age, sex, intestinal sampling site, and sequencing batch had significant effects on both α- and β-diversity (all P < 0.001). Sampling site (6.8%) and diet (6%) had the largest impact on the microbiome, while angiotensin II and sex had the smallest effect (each 0.4%).

CONCLUSION: Our large-scale data confirmed findings from small-scale studies that angiotensin II impacted the gut microbiome. However, this effect was modest relative to most of the other factors studied. Accounting for these factors in future pre-clinical hypertensive studies will increase the likelihood that microbiome findings are replicable and translatable.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.