Affiliations 

  • 1 Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Palliative care unit, Ipoh, Malaysia. Kt4896@hotmail.com
  • 2 Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Palliative care unit, Ipoh, Malaysia
Med J Malaysia, 2024 Mar;79(2):165-169.
PMID: 38553921

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic refractory breathlessness is a debilitating symptom which negatively affects quality of life with profound impact on physical and psychosocial functioning of patients and/or carers. Multidisciplinary based interventions which focus on non-pharmacological approach have shown to be effective. We developed a breathlessness intervention service called breathlessness supportive therapy (BST) in a palliative care unit with limited resources. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of developing a BST service and to study the characteristics and outcome of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale grade ≥ 2 who attended the BST clinic over 1 year period. BST consists of two clinic sessions 2 weeks apart. Data was retrieved from patients' medical notes and analysis done using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were identified. Median age was 69 years with 52% of females. 72% had non-malignant diagnoses. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index score was 6.5. Median mMRC dyspnoea scale was 3. 47.6% had long term oxygen usage. Median Australian Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS) was 65 and the median baseline breathlessness visual analogue scale (VAS) was 2. 62% completed two sessions, the remaining 38% completed only one session. Mean time from BST intervention to death was 18.26 weeks, median was 22 weeks. 72% died at home, whilst 28% died in the hospital. All the patients scored 4 (somewhat agree) and 5 (strongly agree) on the overall feedback score.

CONCLUSIONS: Development of a breathlessness intervention service is feasible in a resource limited setting and generally accepted by most patients. More research and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of BST in the future.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.