Trust in government moderates the association between fear of COVID-19 as well as empathic concern and preventive behaviour

Karakulak A 1 , Tepe B 2 , Dimitrova R 3 , Abdelrahman M 4 , Akaliyski P 5 , Alaseel R 6 Show all authors , Alkamali YA 7 , Amin A 4 , Lizarzaburu Aguinaga DA 8 , Andres A 9 , Aruta JJBR 10 , Assiotis M 11 , Avanesyan H 12 , Ayub N 13 , Bacikova-Sleskova M 14 , Baikanova R 15 , Bakkar B 6 , Bartoluci S 16 , Benitez D 17 , Bodnar I 18 , Bolatov A 15 , Borchet J 19 , Bosnar K 16 , Broche-Pérez Y 20 , Buzea C 21 , Cassibba R 22 , Carbonell MM 23 , Chen BB 24 , Dimitrovska GR 25 , Công Doanh D 26 , Dominguez Espinosa ADC 27 , Edine WG 6 , Ferenczi N 28 , Fernández-Morales R 29 , Gaete J 30 , Gan Y 31 , Giolo S 32 , Giordani RCF 32 , Friehs MT 33 , Gindi S 34 , Gjoneska B 35 , Godoy JC 36 , Del Pilar Grazioso M 37 , Hancheva C 38 , Hapunda G 39 , Hihara S 40 , Husain MS 41 , Islam MS 42 , Janovská A 16 , Javakhishvili N 43 , Jovanović V 44 , Kabir RS 40 , Abdul Kadir NB 45 , Karl J 46 , Katović D 16 , Kauyzbay Z 47 , Kawashima TD 40 , Kazmierczak M 19 , Khanna R 48 , Khosla M 49 , Klicperová-Baker M 50 , Kozina A 51 , Krauss SE 52 , Landabur R 53 , Lefringhausen K 54 , Lewandowska-Walter A 19 , Liang YH 55 , Makashvili A 43 , Malik S 56 , Manrique-Millones D 57 , Mastrotheodoros S 58 , McGrath B 59 , Mechili EA 60 , Mejía M 37 , Mhizha S 61 , Michalek-Kwiecien J 19 , Miconi D 62 , Mohsen F 6 , Moreta-Herrera R 63 , Muhl C 32 , Muradyan M 12 , Musso P 22 , Naterer A 64 , Nemat A 65 , Neto F 66 , Neto J 67 , Palacio LMA 68 , Okati-Aliabad H 69 , Orellana CI 70 , Orellana LM 71 , Mishra SK 72 , Park J 73 , Pavlova I 18 , Peralta E 74 , Petrytsa P 75 , Pišot S 76 , Prot F 16 , Rasia J 32 , Rivera R 17 , Riyanti BPD 77 , Samekin A 78 , Seisembekov T 15 , Serapinas D 79 , Silletti F 22 , Sharma P 80 , Shukla S 81 , Skrzypińska K 19 , Šolcová IP 50 , Solomontos-Kountouri O 11 , Stanciu A 82 , Stefenel D 83 , Steinmetz LCL 36 , Stogianni M 84 , Stuart J 85 , Sudarnoto LF 77 , Sugimura K 40 , Sultana S 42 , Suryani AO 77 , Tair E 86 , Tavitian-Elmadjan L 84 , Thome LD 87 , Uka F 88 , Valickienė RP 79 , Walter B 40 , Wendt GW 89 , Yang PJ 90 , Yıldırım E 91 , Yu Y 92 , Yunes MAM 93 , Zanoni da Silva M 94 , Rudnev M 95

Affiliations 

  • 1 Istanbul Policy Center, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey. arzuaydinlikarakulak@gmail.com
  • 2 Department of Psychology, MEF University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 3 Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 4 Social Psychology Department, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Doha, Qatar
  • 5 Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 6 Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
  • 7 United Private School, Athaiba, Oman
  • 8 Universidad César Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru
  • 9 Department of Physical Education, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 10 Department of Psychology, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
  • 11 Theological School, Church of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
  • 12 General Psychology Chair, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
  • 13 Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia
  • 14 Department of Educational Psychology and Health Psychology, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
  • 15 Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 16 University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 17 Clinical Psychology Department, Albizu University, Miami, FL, USA
  • 18 Lviv State University of Physical Culture, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 19 Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
  • 20 Department of Psychology, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba
  • 21 Department of Social Sciences and Communication, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
  • 22 Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
  • 23 Faculty of Psychology, Cooperative University of Colombia, Santa Marta, Colombia
  • 24 Psychology Department, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 25 Higher Medical School, University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bitola, North Macedonia
  • 26 National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 27 Iberoamerican University, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 28 Department of Life Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
  • 29 Psychology Department, Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala City, Guatemala
  • 30 Faculty of Education, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
  • 31 School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 32 Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
  • 33 Faculty for Psychology, Fern Universität, Hagen, Germany
  • 34 Faculty of Education, Beit Berl College, Kfar Sava, Israel
  • 35 Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, North Macedonia
  • 36 Psychological Research Institute (IIPsi), National University of Córdoba - CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina
  • 37 Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Proyecto Aigle Guatemala, Cdad. de Guatemala, Guatemala
  • 38 Department of General, Experimental, Developmental, and Health Psychology, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 39 Psychology Department, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
  • 40 Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 41 University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • 42 Department of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • 43 Dimitri Uznadze Institute of Psychology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
  • 44 Department of Psychology, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • 45 Center for Research in Psychology and Human Well-being, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia
  • 46 School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 47 South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
  • 48 School of Human Ecology, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 49 University of Delhi, Delhi, India
  • 50 Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 51 Center for Evaluation Studies, Educational Research Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 52 Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang-Selangor, Malaysia
  • 53 Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó, Chile
  • 54 Department of Psychology, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
  • 55 Department of Education, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 56 Department of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • 57 Carrera de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru
  • 58 Department of Youth and Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 59 The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA
  • 60 Department of Healthcare, Faculty of Health, University of Vlora, Vlore, Albania
  • 61 Department of Applied Psychology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
  • 62 Department of Educational Psychology and Andragogy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • 63 School of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador
  • 64 University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
  • 65 Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul, Afghanistan
  • 66 Department of Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 67 REMIT - Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies, Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal
  • 68 Universidad del Norte, Division of Health Sciences, Barranquilla, Colombia
  • 69 Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
  • 70 Social Sciences Doctoral and Master Program, Don Bosco University, Antiguo Cuscatlan, El Salvador
  • 71 Núcleo Científico-Tecnológico en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
  • 72 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, Bangalore, India
  • 73 School of Management, NUCB Business School, Nagoya, Japan
  • 74 Medicine School, Mother and Teacher Pontifical Catholic University, Santiago, Dominican Republic
  • 75 Department of Physical Education and Rehabilitation, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • 76 Institute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Centre Koper, Koper, Slovenia
  • 77 Faculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 78 School of Liberal Arts, M. Narikbayev KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 79 Institute of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • 80 Clinical Psychology Department, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
  • 81 Indian Institute of Management Indore, Indore, India
  • 82 Data and Research on Society, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
  • 83 Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania
  • 84 Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • 85 United Nations University, Macau, Macau SAR
  • 86 Institute for Population and Human Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 87 Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
  • 88 University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina", Prishtina, Kosovo
  • 89 Western Paraná State University, Francisco Beltrão, Brazil
  • 90 Graduate Institute of Social Work, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 91 Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 92 Centre for Research in Child Development, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 93 Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Niterói, Brazil
  • 94 Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG), Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
  • 95 Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Commun Psychol, 2023 Dec 15;1(1):43.
PMID: 39242865 DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00046-5

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, behavioural scientists aimed to illuminate reasons why people comply with (or not) large-scale cooperative activities. Here we investigated the motives that underlie support for COVID-19 preventive behaviours in a sample of 12,758 individuals from 34 countries. We hypothesized that the associations of empathic prosocial concern and fear of disease with support towards preventive COVID-19 behaviours would be moderated by trust in the government. Results suggest that the association between fear of disease and support for COVID-19 preventive behaviours was strongest when trust in the government was weak (both at individual- and country-level). Conversely, the association with empathic prosocial concern was strongest when trust in the government was high, but this moderation was only found at individual-level scores of governmental trust. We discuss how motivations may be shaped by socio-cultural context, and outline how findings may contribute to a better understanding of collective action during global crises.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications