Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: lc749@cantab.ac.uk
  • 2 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 4 École de travail social, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
  • 5 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 6 Department of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
  • 7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • 8 Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
  • 9 Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  • 10 Department of Sociology, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
  • 11 Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 12 Department of Social Determinants of Health, Division of Healthier Populations, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
Lancet Healthy Longev, 2024 Dec;5(12):100647.
PMID: 39681125 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100647

Abstract

Globally, abuse of older people (AOP) affects one in six individuals aged 60 years and older every year. Despite the widespread prevalence of AOP, evidence-based interventions for preventing and responding to this issue are insufficient. To address this gap, WHO proposed an initiative to accelerate the development of effective interventions for AOP across all country income levels. In the first phase, the initiative identified 89 promising interventions across a total of 101 evaluations or descriptions, which led to the creation of a public database. Most interventions targeted physical, psychological, and financial abuse and neglect, were implemented in the USA, and focused on victims or potential victims. These interventions were primarily delivered by social workers and nurses, usually in health-care facilities and community centres. Face-to-face delivery was common. Additionally, 28 (28%) of the 101 evaluations used randomised controlled trial designs. The results of this Review can be used to identify interventions that are ready for a rigorous outcome evaluation.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.