Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. terenceong@doctors.org.uk
Arch Osteoporos, 2024 Aug 03;19(1):70.
PMID: 39096395 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01427-x

Abstract

Fracture Liaison Service is a coordinator-based model effective in addressing the fragility fracture care gap. This study found that the service was feasible in Malaysia and could improve the delivery of secondary fracture prevention. Local adaptations and reactive responses addressed challenges, enhancing feasibility.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a Fracture Liaison Service in Malaysia and to benchmark our service against the International Osteoporosis Foundation Best Practice Framework.

METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from March 2021 to March 2022. Patients aged ≥ 50 years admitted with fragility fractures were recruited. Excluded were those with poor prognosis or transferred out from the hospital during admission. Patients were screened, assessed, and followed up at months 4 and 12 post-fracture presentations. Data was collected using Microsoft Excel and the REDCap database. The feasibility of the Fracture Liaison Service was evaluated using the typology of feasibility.

RESULTS: A total of 140 patients (female (93/140, 66.4%), median age 77 (IQR 72, 83), hip fractures (100/140, 65.8%)) were recruited into the Fracture Liaison Service. The recruitment rate was (140/215, 65.1%), as some patients were "missed" due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The completion rate was high (101/114, 88.6%). Among those indicated for antiosteoporosis medication, 82/100 (82%) were initiated on treatment. Various "Best Practice Standards," such as patient evaluation (140/140, 100%), fall prevention (130/140, 92.9%), and medication review standards (15/15, 100%) were high. Complicated referral pathways, inexperienced staff, lack of resources, and communication issues were some of the barriers identified while implementing the Fracture Liaison Service. Challenges were overcome by modifying the service workflow and coordinating with different departments.

CONCLUSION: The Fracture Liaison Service was found to be feasible in Malaysia. It demonstrated promise in improving bone health management; however, several changes were needed to adapt the service to suit our environment.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.