Affiliations 

  • 1 The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  • 2 London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Br J Soc Psychol, 2025 Apr;64(2):e12848.
PMID: 39873313 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12848

Abstract

This paper sheds light on how spaces become contested sites for identity construction and negotiation to take place. Applying the Social Representations Approach, a qualitative study of 10 focus group discussions (n = 39), was conducted in Singapore, Malaysia and the UK to explore how, and why racialised identity construction changed in each socio-political context. The study challenged two underlying assumptions in social psychology: (1) that the meaning of the racialised category holds constant across time and space, and (2) there exists a pan-racial identification among Asian identities, for example, which at times allows for racialised categories to be manipulated as variables. We argue that the distinction between the country that the racialised identity originates from, country of birth (or citizenship) for the individual and country that the individual manages the identity in, is important in understanding the changes in the psychology of racialised identities. By taking into consideration the interplay of temporality, space, social relations and social systems, this paper presents a contribution in the form of the concept "politicized psycho-geographies".

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.