Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Special Education and Counselling, Education University of Hong Kong
  • 2 Department of Psychology, Stockholm University
  • 3 Center for Research in Psychology and Human Well-Being, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri
  • 5 Singapore Centre for Character and Citizenship Education, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University
  • 6 Department of Psychology, De La Salle University
  • 7 Faculty of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia
  • 8 Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Thammasat University
Dev Psychol, 2025 Mar 31.
PMID: 40167544 DOI: 10.1037/dev0001956

Abstract

Positive youth development (PYD) has gained considerable traction among developmental scientists, but past studies were generally conducted among youth samples from Minority World countries. This study investigated the factorial validity of the newly developed 7Cs model of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, caring, contribution, and creativity). Specifically, we compared four measurement models (one-factor, seven-factor, higher order, and bifactor) among emerging adults living in five Southeast Asian countries. The study also aimed to establish evidence of measurement invariance across gender, age, education, and country of origin. Criterion-related validity was also sought using COVID-19 socially responsive behaviors and anxiety. Controlling for the influence of gender, age, and education, sample-level comparisons were also performed on the 7Cs. Data came from 1,888 emerging adults (Mage = 24.10; SDage = 6.89) from Indonesia (n = 253), Malaysia (n = 289), the Philippines (n = 496), Singapore (n = 306), and Thailand (n = 544) during the pandemic. The results supported the superiority of the seven-factor model, which exhibited strict invariance across gender, age, and education and partial scalar invariance across country of origin. The 7Cs exhibited mixed associations with the pandemic-related measures. Significant differences were found in the 7Cs across the five countries. The study provides additional evidence on the theoretical validity of the 7Cs model among youth from understudied settings, while also highlighting avenues for refining current PYD measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.