Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia
  • 2 Division of Psychology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Australia. Electronic address: jason.satel@utas.edu.au
Acta Psychol (Amst), 2018 Feb;183:51-57.
PMID: 29328938 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.011

Abstract

Studies of endogenous and exogenous attentional orienting in spatial cueing paradigms have been used to investigate inhibition of return, a behavioral phenomenon characterized by delayed reaction time in response to recently attended locations. When eye movements are suppressed, attention is covertly oriented to central or peripheral stimuli. Overt orienting, on the other hand, requires explicit eye movements to the stimuli. The present study examined the time course of slowed reaction times to previously attended locations when distractors are introduced into overt and covert orienting tasks. In a series of experiments, manual responses were required to targets following central and peripheral cues at three different cue-target intervals, with and without activated oculomotor systems. The results demonstrate that, when eye movements are suppressed, behavioral inhibition is reduced or delayed in magnitude by the presence of a distractor relative to conditions without distractors. However, the time course of behavioral inhibition when eye movements are required remains similar with or without distractors.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.