Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China; Smart and Sustainable Township Research Centre (SUTRA), Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environmental, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • 2 Smart and Sustainable Township Research Centre (SUTRA), Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environmental, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • 3 School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. Electronic address: dengh2016@scut.edu.cn
  • 4 Teikyo University, 359 Otsuka, Hachioji City, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5 School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
J Environ Manage, 2019 May 01;237:255-263.
PMID: 30798044 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.033

Abstract

After twenty-four years of government efforts, the latest national recycling rate in Malaysia rose from 5% in 1993 to approximately 24.6% in 2017. However, the practice of solid waste recycling in developing countries is still challenging compared to developing countries. Especially in Malaysia, a multi-ethnic country where people with different ethics have different living lifestyles. Still, Malaysia faces rapidly increasing solid waste and management costs, lacks appropriate data on solid waste management and recycling, lacks awareness of the 3R's (reduce, reuse and recycle) culture and lacks policies to promote 3R's culture. In addition, prior to the enforcement of ACT 672, information and networks between stakeholders have been limited for more than 20 years. Some scholars believe that the success of recycling practices is mainly influenced by community recycling behaviours. Therefore, in order to improve and evaluate the effectiveness of current national solid waste recycling management systems, research and assessment of community recycling behaviours are essential. This paper aims to evaluate the factors that attract communities to implement recycling in their daily lives and to obtain data through quantitative survey methods. Face-to-face questionnaires are conducted through purposive sampling and collected data is further analysed by PASW statistical tools. The comparison between recyclers and non-recyclers are presented in terms of frequency, means scores and radar chart. The results indicate that policy makers involved in the planning, organisation, and implementation of community recycling programs have to focus on strategies that engage community members and adopt recycling practices to improve environmental impact by changing their attitudes. Based on the results of means scores, the type of age, occupation and place of life must be taken into consideration in order to organize future recycling campaigns or awareness programs. In conclusion, the information will help policymakers make better solid waste recycling management to meet the needs of the public.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.