Affiliations 

  • 1 Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau
  • 2 Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • 3 Sports Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • 5 Faculty of Physical Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
  • 6 College of Sports, Physical Education and Recreation, Mindanao State University, Mawari, Phillipines
  • 7 Department of Leisure and Sports Studies, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 8 Department of Physical Education, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • 9 Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
  • 10 Hunan Normal University, Hunan, China
PLoS One, 2019;14(8):e0218158.
PMID: 31369586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218158

Abstract

Physical education professionals aim to develop quality programmes for physical education. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale using professionals' perceptions of Quality Physical Education QPE in Asia using twenty-four items regarding QPE quality issues. The items covered status and roles, development of educational elements and supportive features in physical education. A sample of N = 799 sport and physical education professionals from eleven Asian cities participated in this questionnaire survey. Twenty-four items relating to QPE were examined via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using maximum likelihood extraction and direct oblimin rotation methods. Nevertheless, only 20 items were extracted following the EFA examination. Items 1, 9, 14 and 18 were excluded because of low factor loadings. The remaining items were clustered into four subscales: Development and Supportive Elements for Quality Physical Education in Schools (DSFQPE; α = .918), Core Values of Quality Physical Education (CVPE; α = .908), Curriculum Arrangement of Physical Activities (CAPA; α = .884) and Provision and Norms in Physical Education (PNPE; α = .865). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = .875) indicated excellent internal consistency for the overall measure. Furthermore, the 4 retained factors from the EFA were assessed via robust confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The 4-factor model demonstrated a good fit with the data (CMIN/DF = 3.450, CFI = .928, TLI = .916, PCFI = .801, RMSEA = .078). The study identified a 4-factor structure with internal consistency and acceptable interfactor correlations. The structure seemed to be applicable, including the twenty items identified as useful and necessary tools for the framework of analysis in the investigation of diverse settings for the study of quality physical education.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.