Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2 Malaysia Program, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • 3 Johor National Parks Corporation (JNPC), Kota Iskandar, Johor, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 5 Global Conservation Programs, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Bronx, NY, United States of America
PeerJ, 2020;8:e8209.
PMID: 32002318 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8209

Abstract

The need for conservation scientists to produce research of greater relevance to practitioners is now increasingly recognized. This study provides an example of scientists working alongside practitioners and policy makers to address a question of immediate relevance to elephant conservation in Malaysia and using the results to inform wildlife management policy and practice including the National Elephant Conservation Action Plan for Peninsular Malaysia. Since ensuring effective conservation of elephants in the Endau Rompin Landscape (ERL) in Peninsular Malaysia is difficult without data on population parameters we (1) conducted a survey to assess the size of the elephant population, (2) used that information to assess the viability of the population under different management scenarios including translocation of elephants out of the ERL (a technique long used in Malaysia to mitigate human-elephant conflict (HEC)), and (3) assessed a number of options for managing the elephant population and HEC in the future. Our dung-count based survey in the ERL produced an estimate of 135 (95% CI [80-225]) elephants in the 2,500 km2 area. The population is thus of national significance, containing possibly the second largest elephant population in Peninsular Malaysia, and with effective management elephant numbers could probably double. We used the data from our survey plus other sources to conduct a population viability analysis to assess relative extinction risk under different management scenarios. Our results demonstrate that the population cannot sustain even very low levels of removal for translocation or anything other than occasional poaching. We describe, therefore, an alternative approach, informed by this analysis, which focuses on in situ management and non-translocation-based methods for preventing or mitigating HEC. The recommended approach includes an increase in law enforcement to protect the elephants and their habitat, maintenance of habitat connectivity between the ERL and other elephant habitat, and a new focus on adaptive management.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.