Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute of Community Health Care, School of Nursing, 34882National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 2 Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, 4616King's College London, London, UK
  • 3 Department of Palliative Medicine, 12885Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • 4 Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • 5 Hospis Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 6 Concord Centre for Palliative Care, Concord, Australia
  • 7 108118African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda
  • 8 Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 68751National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore Cheng-Pei Lin and Sabah Boufkhed are joint first authors
Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2021 Jul;38(7):861-868.
PMID: 33789503 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211002797

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospice and palliative care services provision for COVID-19 patients is crucial to improve their life quality. There is limited evidence on COVID-19 preparedness of such services in the Asia-Pacific region.

AIM: To evaluate the preparedness and capacity of hospice and palliative care services in the Asia-Pacific region to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD: An online cross-sectional survey was developed based on methodology guidance. Asia-Pacific Hospice and Palliative Care Network subscribers (n = 1551) and organizational members (n = 185) were emailed. Descriptive analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS: Ninety-seven respondents completed the survey. Around half of services were hospital-based (n = 47, 48%), and public-funded (n = 46, 47%). Half of services reported to have confirmed cases (n = 47, 49%) and the majority of the confirmed cases were patients (n = 28, 61%). Staff perceived moderate risk of being infected by COVID-19 (median: 7/10). > 85% of respondents reported they had up-to-date contact list for staff and patients, one-third revealed challenges to keep record of relatives who visited the services (n = 30, 31%), and of patients visited in communities (n = 29, 30%). Majority of services (60%) obtained adequate resources for infection control except face mask. More than half had no guidance on Do Not Resuscitate orders (n = 59, 66%) or on bereavement care for family members (n = 44, 51%).

CONCLUSION: Recommendations to strengthen the preparedness of palliative care services include: 1) improving the access to face mask; 2) acquiring stress management protocols for staff when unavailable; 3) reinforcing the contact tracing system for relatives and visits in the community and 4) developing guidance on patient and family care during patient's dying trajectory.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.