Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (IPS), University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences (UVAS), Lahore, Pakistan; School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. Electronic address: hammad.saleem@uvas.edu.pk
  • 2 Bahawalpur College of Pharmacy, Bahawalpur Medical and Dental College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • 3 College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  • 4 Department of Chemistry, Township Campus, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 5 Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia
  • 6 Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • 8 Chemistry Department, College of Education, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Iraq
  • 9 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mauritius, Mauritius
  • 10 School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Food Chem Toxicol, 2021 Aug;154:112348.
PMID: 34144099 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112348

Abstract

Suaeda fruticosa is an edible medicinal halophyte known for its traditional uses. In this study, methanol and dichloromethane extracts of S. fruticosa were explored for phytochemical, biological and toxicological parameters. Total phenolic and flavonoid constituents were determined by using standard aluminum chloride and Folin-Ciocalteu methods, and UHPLC-MS analysis of methanol extract was performed for tentative identification of secondary metabolites. Different standard methods like DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and metal chelation assays were utilized to find out the antioxidant potential of extracts. Enzyme inhibition studies of extracts against acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, tyrosinase, α-amylase and, α-glucosidase enzymes were also studied. Likewise, the cytotoxicity was also assessed against MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and DU-145 cell lines. The higher phenolic and flavonoids contents were observed in methanol extracts which can be correlated to its higher radical scavenging potential. Similarly, 11 different secondary metabolites were tentatively identified by UHPLC profiling. Both the extract showed significant inhibition against all the enzymes except for α-glucosidase. Moreover, docking studies were also performed against the tested enzymes. In the case of cytotoxicity, both the samples were found moderately toxic against the tested cell lines. This plant can be explored further for its potential therapeutic and edible uses.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications