METHODOLOGY: This prospective observational study recruited kidney transplant recipients from August 2019 through April 2021 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Blood tests for lymphocyte subsets were taken at pre-transplant, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-transplantation. At transplantation, recipients received either basiliximab, low-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 1.5 mg/kg), or standard-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 5 mg/kg).
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were recruited: 38.5% received basiliximab (15 of 39), 15.4% received low-dose thymoglobulin (6 of 39), and 46.2% received standard-dose thymoglobulin (18 of 39). Absolute lymphocyte counts 1 week post-transplantation were 1.5 ± 0.84 × 109/L for basiliximab, 0.7 ± 0.57 × 109/L for low-dose thymoglobulin, and 0.1 ± 0.08 × 109/L for standard-dose thymoglobulin (P < .001). The CD4+ and CD8+ counts were severely depleted in the standard-dose thymoglobulin group, with a statistically significant differenceup to 6 months post-transplantation. In the low-dose thymoglobulin group, the CD4+ and CD8+ counts were depleted at 1 week post-transplantation and recovered at 1 month post-transplantation. There was no difference in allograft function and incidence of allograft rejection across groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects on lymphocyte counts, CD4+ and CD8+, vary depending on the type and dose of induction immunosuppression. This could be a guiding tool in managing immunosuppression post-transplantation depending on the patient's immunologic risk.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study on KTRs with functioning renal allograft and at least 3 months post transplant. Dietary protein, salt, and dietary acid load were estimated using 24-hour urine collection. Demographic characteristics, concomitant medications, medical history, and laboratory results were obtained from electronic medical records.
RESULTS: A total of 204 KTRs were recruited with median age of 48 years (interquartile range [IQR], 18 years); male to female ratio was 61:39. A total of 79.9% (n = 163) were living related kidney transplants. The median duration after transplant was 71 months (IQR, 131 months), and median eGFR was 65 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 25 mL/min/1.73 m2). The prevalence rates of proteinuria (defined as ≥ 0.5 g/d) and metabolic acidosis (defined as at least 2 readings of serum bicarbonate ≤ 22 mmol/L in the past 6 months) were 17.7 % and 6.2%, respectively. High dietary protein of > 1.2 g/kg ideal body weight (adjusted odds ratio, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.35-7.28; P = .008) was significantly associated with proteinuria. Dietary protein, salt, and acid load did not correlate with chronic metabolic acidosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence rate of proteinuria is consistent with published literature, but metabolic acidosis rate is extremely low in our cohort. High protein intake (> 1.2 g/kg ideal body weight) is a risk factor of proteinuria and may have negative impact on KTR outcome.
OBJECTIVE: We explore the use of CrCl and combined urea and creatinine clearance as an alternative for GFR assessment.
METHODS: A retrospective study involving 81 kidney donors from 2007 to 2020, with mGFR collected by chromium 51-labeled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) and CrCl and combined urea and creatinine clearance. We analyzed the performance of CrCl and combined urea and creatinine clearance against 51Cr-EDTA. Adequacy of urine volume was taken into consideration.
RESULTS: A total of 81 candidates with a mean age of 44.80 ± 10.77 years were enrolled. Mean mGFR from 51Cr-EDTA was 123.66 ± 26.91 mL/min/1.73 m2, and combined urea and creatinine clearance and CrCl were 122.13 ± 47.07 and 133.40 ± 36.32 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. CrCl overestimated 51Cr-EDTA. Though combined urea and creatinine clearance had minimal bias, it had a lower correlation coefficient (0.25 vs 0.43), lower precision (49.51 vs 38.10), and slightly lower accuracy within 30% of 51Cr-EDTA (74.07% vs 76.54%).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined urea and creatinine clearance did not improve the performance of CrCl. Nevertheless, it can potentially be used as first-line GFR assessment, followed by mGFR in selected donors, to ascertain threshold of safe kidney donation. A stringent urine collection method is essential to ensure accurate measurement.
RESULTS: From the survey, it was found that the regional anaesthesia rate for caesarean section was 46% in the government hospitals compared to 29.2% in the private hospitals, with spinal anaesthesia being the most common regional anaesthetic technique used in both types of hospitals. The epidural rate for labour analgesia was only 1.5% overall for the country. Epidural analgesia services were available in all private hospitals whereas 17.6% of government hospitals surveyed did not offer this service at all.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of epidural analgesia for labour was low in Malaysia, the overall rate of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section (41.9%) is very much in keeping with the standards of safe practice recommended by the United Kingdom.