METHODS: GHS classification for reproductive toxicity of 157 UOG-related chemicals identified as potential reproductive or developmental toxicants in a previous publication was assessed using eleven governmental regulatory agency databases. If there was discordance in classifications across agencies, the most stringent classification was assigned. Chemicals in the category of known or presumed human reproductive toxicants were further evaluated for carcinogenicity and germ cell mutagenicity based on government classifications. A scoring system was utilized to assign numerical values for reproductive health, cancer and germ cell mutation hazard endpoints. Using a Cytoscape analysis, both qualitative and quantitative results were presented visually to readily identify high priority UOG chemicals with evidence of multiple adverse effects.
RESULTS: We observed substantial inconsistencies in classification among the 11 databases. By adopting the most stringent classification within and across countries, 43 chemicals were classified as known or presumed human reproductive toxicants (GHS Category 1), while 31 chemicals were classified as suspected human reproductive toxicants (GHS Category 2). The 43 reproductive toxicants were further subjected to analysis for carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. Calculated hazard scores and Cytoscape visualization yielded several high priority chemicals including potassium dichromate, cadmium, benzene and ethylene oxide.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal diverging GHS classification outcomes for UOG chemicals across regulatory agencies. Adoption of the most stringent classification with application of hazard scores provides a useful approach to prioritize reproductive toxicants in UOG and other industries for exposure assessments and selection of safer alternatives.
RESULTS: Twenty-five hydrocarbons, common in air pollution with carcinogenicity classification of 1 A/B or 2 (known/presumed or suspected human carcinogen), were divided into three groups: alkanes and alkenes, halogenated hydrocarbons, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. The in silico data-mining revealed 87 and 44 genes commonly interacted with most of the investigated hydrocarbons are linked to breast and lung cancer, respectively. The dominant interactions among the common genes are co-expression, physical interaction, genetic interaction, co-localization, and interaction in shared protein domains. Among these genes, only 16 are common in the development of both cancers. Benzo(a)pyrene and tetrachlorodibenzodioxin interacted with all 16 genes. The molecular pathways potentially affected by the investigated hydrocarbons include aryl hydrocarbon receptor, chemical carcinogenesis, ferroptosis, fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis, interleukin 17 signaling pathway, lipid and atherosclerosis, NRF2 pathway, and oxidative stress response.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the inherent limitations of in silico toxicogenomics tools, we elucidated the molecular pathways associated with breast and lung cancer development potentially affected by hydrocarbons mixture. Our findings indicate adaptive responses to oxidative stress and inflammatory damages are instrumental in the development of both cancers. Additionally, ferroptosis-a non-apoptotic programmed cell death driven by lipid peroxidation and iron homeostasis-was identified as a new player in these responses. Finally, AHR potential involvement in modulating IL-8, a critical gene that mediates breast cancer invasion and metastasis to the lungs, was also highlighted. A deeper understanding of the interplay between genes associated with these pathways, and other survival signaling pathways identified in this study, will provide invaluable knowledge in assessing the risk of inhalation exposure to hydrocarbons mixture. The findings offer insights into future in vivo and in vitro laboratory investigations that focus on inhalation exposure to the hydrocarbons mixture.