MyMedR

Displaying publications 21 - 30 of 30 in total

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Peripheral Intravenous Catheterisation in Obstetric Patients in the Hand or Forearm Vein: A Randomised Trial

Tan PC, Mackeen A, Khong SY, Omar SZ, Noor Azmi MA

Sci Rep, 2016 Mar 18;6:23223.
PMID: 26987593 DOI: 10.1038/srep23223

A peripheral intravenous catheter is often inserted as part of care during labour. The catheter is inserted into the back of the hand or lower forearm vein in usual practice. There is no trial data to guide the care provider on which is the better insertion site in any clinical setting. 307 women admitted to the labour ward who required insertion of intravenous catheter were randomised to back of hand or lower forearm vein catheter insertion. Catheter insertion is by junior to mid-grade providers. We evaluated insertion success at the first attempt, pain during insertion and catheter replacement due to malfunction as main outcomes. After catheter removal, we recorded patient satisfaction with site, future site preference and insertion site swelling, bruising, tenderness, vein thrombosis and pain. Insertion of a catheter into back of hand vein is more likely to be successful at the first attempt. Insertion pain score, catheter replacement rate, patient satisfaction, patient fidelity to site in a future insertion and insertion site complications rate are not different between trial arms. In conclusion, both insertion sites are suitable; the back of the hand vein maybe easier to cannulate and seems to be preferred by our frontline providers.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Fulltext Candida albicans infection of a prosthetic knee replacement: a case report

Badrul B, Ruslan G

Med J Malaysia, 2000 Sep;55 Suppl C:93-6.
PMID: 11200051

We report a 64 year old man who developed Candida albicans infection following total knee arthroplasty. A two-stage exchange arthroplasty was performed after an initial swab culture grew Acinobacter sp. A scanty growth of yeast was also found from the tissue culture. Intravenous cefuroxime was instituted for six weeks followed by reimplantation four months after the removal. Three weeks after that revision, the prosthesis became infected and a culture of knee aspirate established the diagnosis of Candida albicans infection. Treatment consisted of thorough debridement of the involved joint and oral fluconazole for a year. Infection was never totally resolved and a secondary infection with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus then developed. Excision arthroplasty was done at two and a half years after the initial infection. At five years follow-up the infection was quiescent and he had a range of movement of 30 degrees to 70 degrees. Knee brace was used to control the valgus-varus stability.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Placement of removable metal biliary stent in post-orthotopic liver transplantation anastomotic stricture

Tee HP, James MW, Kaffes AJ

World J Gastroenterol, 2010 Jul 28;16(28):3597-600.
PMID: 20653071

Postoperative biliary strictures are the most common cause of benign biliary stricture in Western countries, secondary to either operative injury or bile duct anastomotic stricture following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Surgery or endoscopic interventions are the mainstay of treatment for benign biliary strictures. We aim to report the outcome of 2 patients with refractory anastomotic biliary stricture post-OLT, who had successful temporary placement of a prototype removable covered self-expandable metal stent (RCSEMS). These 2 patients (both men, aged 44 and 53 years) were given temporary placement of a prototype RCSEMS (8.5 Fr gauge delivery system, 8 mm x 40 mm stent dimensions) in the common bile duct across the biliary stricture. There was no morbidity associated with stent placement and removal in these 2 cases. Clinical parameters improved after the RCSEMS placement. Long-term biliary patency was achieved in both the patients. No further biliary intervention was required within 14 and 18 mo follow-up after stent removal.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Opacification of AcriFlex 50CSE hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses

Lim AK, Goh PP, Azura R, Mariam I

J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011 Apr;37(4):655-9.
PMID: 21420589 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.050

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for AcriFlex 50CSE hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) opacification approximately 3 years after implantation.
SETTING: Selayang Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Patients who had AcriFlex 50CSE IOL implantation in 2005 and 2006 were identified from operating logbooks and recalled via telephone and letters. Opaque IOLs were explanted and sent for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
RESULTS: The review showed that 18 patients had died and 67 had declined examination or could not be contacted, leaving 239 eyes for evaluation. The age of the patients ranged from 25 to 85 years. Of the patients, 83 (34.7%) were Malay, 127 (53.1%) Chinese, and 29 (12.1%) East Indian. The male:female ratio was 1:1. Fourteen eyes of 13 patients (5.4%) had IOL opacification; 1 had bilateral opacification. Five eyes had fine deposits, and 9 eyes had dense opaque deposits. Seven opaque IOLs required explantation. There was no correlation between age (P=.645), sex (P=.319), or race (P=.860) and IOL opacification. Pearson chi-square analysis showed a strong association between diabetes mellitus and IOL opacification (P=.019). Nine (69.2%) of the 13 patients with opacification had diabetes. Scanning electron microscopy and EDS showed calcium and phosphate deposits on the optic surface and intralenticularly near the anterior surface of the optic.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for AcriFlex hydrophilic acrylic IOL opacification. In some cases, opacification affected vision, necessitating explantation. The pathophysiology of this complication is unknown.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Fulltext Delayed onset porous polyethylene implant-related inflammation after orbital blowout fracture repair: four case reports

Aryasit O, Ng DS, Goh ASC, Woo KI, Kim YD

BMC Ophthalmol, 2016 Jul 07;16:94.
PMID: 27387333 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0287-0

BACKGROUND: Porous polyethylene implants are commonly used in orbital blowout fracture repair because of purported biocompatibility, durability, and low frequency of complications. Delayed inflammation related to porous polyethylene sheet implants is very rare and no case series of this condition have been reported.
CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective review of clinical presentations, radiographic findings, histopathological findings, treatments, and outcomes of patients who developed delayed complications in orbital blowout fracture repair using porous polyethylene sheets. Four male patients were included with a mean age of 49 years (range 35-69 years). Blowout fracture repair was complicated with implant-related inflammation 10 months, 2 years, 3 years, and 8 years after surgery. Chronic and subacute orbital inflammatory signs were noted in two patients and acute fulminant orbital inflammation was found in two patients. Three patients developed peri-implant abscesses and one patient had a soft tissue mass around the implant. All patients underwent implant removal and two of these patients with paranasal sinusitis had sinus surgery. Histopathological findings revealed chronic inflammatory changes with fibrosis, and one patient had foreign body granuloma with culture positive Staphylococcus aureus.
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed complications with porous polyethylene sheets used in orbital blowout fracture repair may occur many years following the initial surgery in immunocompetent patients. Low-grade or fulminant inflammation could complicate blowout fracture repair related with the implant.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Pediatric empyema thoracis: roles and outcomes of surgery in advanced disease

Ho YL, Jamaluddin MF, Krishinan S, Salleh A, Khamis AY, Abdul Kareem BA

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2020 Mar;28(3):152-157.
PMID: 32122151 DOI: 10.1177/0218492320910932
Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Iatrogenic displacement of high-speed bur during third molar removal

Rajaran JR, Nazimi AJ, Rajandram RK

BMJ Case Rep, 2017 Sep 27;2017.
PMID: 28954756 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221892

Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar is a routine procedure in oral surgery. Various iatrogenic complications related to the procedure has been discussed well in the literatures before. Some of these complications are related to the wrong usage of instruments and techniques. Here we discuss a rare complication on a 42-year-old male, related to the use of high-speed handpiece drill in mandibular third molar removal in a general dental office setting. He was referred when a high speed tungsten carbide bur was accidentally broken and displaced into the mandibular bone during surgical procedure. It is not common to use a high-speed handpiece in impacted third molar removal. This iatrogenic complication could have been totally avoided with the use of proper equipment and technique; therefore raising awareness regarding wrong usage of instrument is vital to avoid similar incidents in the future.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Fulltext Antegrade repositioning of Memokath stent in malignant ureteroileal anastomotic stricture

Ng KL, Nawawi O, Lim BK, Htun TH, Dublin N, Razack AH

Asian J Surg, 2017 Apr;40(2):171-174.
PMID: 24210538 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.09.012

Ureteric strictures are common and can be due to benign or malignant causes. Various surgical treatments can be used from minimally invasive endoscopic retrograde JJ stent insertion, balloon dilatation, ureterolithotomy, to open surgical exploration and repair. Memokath 051 stent is a metallic stent designed for long-term ureteral stenting in the management of ureteral strictures. The insertion of this device is usually a straightforward procedure performed endoscopically in a retrograde fashion via cystoscopy. However, this procedure can be difficult in complicated scenarios when the bladder has been removed with neoureteral reimplantations or high-grade strictures. Here, we report a case of Memokath stent insertion complicated by placement difficulties in a lady with ileal conduit due to previous ovarian cancer complicated by vesicovaginal fistula, who presented with malignant stricture of the ureteroileal anastomosis. We describe a simple yet effective antegrade technique to precisely reposition the malpositioned Memokath stent, along with illustrations.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Revision of total hip arthroplasty using an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an impaction graft: follow-up study

Arif M, Sivananthan S, Choon DS

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2004 Jun;12(1):25-30.
PMID: 15237118

To report the outcome of revised total hip arthroplasty procedures involving an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an Exeter impaction graft.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal
Pyogenic Granuloma Formation Following Ahmed Valve Glaucoma Implant

Chendran P, Seng Fai T, Wan Abdul Halim WH, Md Din N

J Glaucoma, 2019 10;28(10):e162-e164.
PMID: 31368915 DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001334

Ocular pyogenic granuloma is a benign tumor seen after ocular insult secondary to ocular surgeries, trauma or infection. Although benign, intervention is sometimes necessary. Previous authors have reported pyogenic granuloma formation following oculoplastic surgeries. We report a pyogenic granuloma after an Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. A 65-year-old gentleman presented with right eye redness associated with pain and swelling ~2 months after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Examination found a sessile growth on the tube extruding puss with signs of endophthalmitis. The glaucoma drainage device was explanted and culture results grew Staphylococcus aureus. This article discusses the formation of pyogenic granuloma on a glaucoma drainage device and its management.

Matched MeSH terms: Device Removal